 | | Re: Not embarassed to be a Canadian anymore...
|
|
(...) I wouldn't exactly call "he who has the biggest stick" a naive solution-- perhaps a tried and proven one.... Remember, Saddam has a pretty big stick himself-- he has butchered 100,000s of his own people with it! So why are so many bleeding (...) (23 years ago, 24-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Habeas Corpus? Never heard of it...
|
|
(URL) bother with silly old due process... just lock them away for months or years and we'll all be a lot safer. "them" in this context being whoever it is the government has squirreled away for our protection. Not sure who exactly that *is* since (...) (23 years ago, 24-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Not embarassed to be a Canadian anymore...
|
|
(...) Let me also point out what Pat B is saying about Canadians--"Look at all we have done for them and they continue to whine." K, Pat, I'm sitting here waiting for you to list all the great and wondrous things you "'Mericans" have done for us (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Not embarassed to be a Canadian anymore...
|
|
(...) And I wonder how we would all feel if Dubya at least acted like a true leader of "the people"--leading them to do the right thing--instead of trotting down the same old 'naive solution' of 'he who has the biggest stick'. What I want to hear, (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Not embarassed to be a Canadian anymore...
|
|
(...) Why is it that when Limbaugh, Reagan, Gallagher, Buchannan, Falwell, Robertson, Carlson, Will, O'Reilly et al spout pro-Republican invective it's called "fair and balanced reporting," but when a left-leaning commentator voices n opinion it's (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Not embarassed to be a Canadian anymore...
|
|
(...) I can't help but to wonder if this person's opinion would be different had OBL leveled a different target-- namely Toronto's First Canadian Place. He may disagree with Bush's decisions handling worldwide terrorism, but calling them "moronic" (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Vote against/for...
|
|
(...) It's not. But we're performing a useful service to the country nonetheless. A filibuster proof Senate with the likes of Bob Barr running some things is a scary thought to behold. (...) c /libertarian Republicans/Libertarians/ and you're on to (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Vote against/for...
|
|
(...) If that's all your party ever wants to aspire to be (a spoiler), then knock yourselves out. But think about this: think about a senate with *no* clear majority and libertarian Republicans controlling the swing votes. That's power. What you (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Vote against/for...
|
|
(...) See also this analysis... (URL) an admittedly partisan source) My favorite excerpt: "It marks the third consecutive election in which a Libertarian has cost the Republican Party a Senate seat," wrote Miller. "If there had been no Libertarian (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Not embarassed to be a Canadian anymore...
|
|
(URL) still embarassed that JC is the PM, but that's neither here nor there... Someone, somewhere, in a position of Canadian Authority, told it like it is. Though I would never call any person a moron, I would call a persons policies and directives (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | saw this link on MegaTokyo.com and thought of here.
|
|
(URL) you enjoy it. I thought it was pretty funny. Unfortunately. (23 years ago, 23-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The Sniper Case
|
|
(...) prejudiced media, it seems that Cassel (the author) has similarly predetermined Malvo's "proper" fate. Who is she to say that he should get a sheltered life in prison rather than a death sentence? I'm not saying I'm for one result over (...) (23 years ago, 22-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | People in glass houses should be careful when pointing fingers...
|
|
For those that thought that the US was the only place with silly laws: (URL) accidentally swaying to music in a pub is a ticketable offense in Westminster and perhaps elsewhere in London as well. Having two musicians performing apparently is OK but (...) (23 years ago, 22-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Q. Where is the USA? A. You are standing on it!
|
|
(...) I probably should have worded the above a little more carefully. I did not mean to imply that people in the US do not need to understand other peoples (though even there, I would argue that there is still less need for a cashier in the US to (...) (23 years ago, 22-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Q. Where is the USA? A. You are standing on it!
|
|
(...) I agree 100%. However, Joe Public has to understand that by bombing/supporting dictator X, a whole region can be destabilised. (...) Hmm, and to think I only put "perceived" in to stop any knee jerks... ;) Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 22-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Q. Where is the USA? A. You are standing on it!
|
|
(...) That's very true, but I think it's more important to be able to understand and empathize with the people of Djibouti, for instance, than it is to be able to find their nation on the map. That's certainly not to imply that Americans have any (...) (23 years ago, 22-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The Sniper Case
|
|
(...) I’m pretty bemused by CNN’s reaction to the way things are unfolding. My understanding is that it is pretty much the media who are dictating how things evolve. Scott A (23 years ago, 22-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Q. Where is the USA? A. You are standing on it!
|
|
(...) I think if we all understood each other a little better, life for us all would be much better. I have seen a relatively small part of the world, but I have learned a lot from *every* country I have visited and *every* culture I have (...) (23 years ago, 22-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Q. Where is the USA? A. You are standing on it!
|
|
(...) "The skinny" indeed: (URL) Dave! (23 years ago, 22-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Q. Where is the USA? A. You are standing on it!
|
|
(...) Hmm. I thought your were just parodying Bush... ;0 Scott A (23 years ago, 22-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: How not to get fired...
|
|
I'm saddened that it took you a week to respond to my post, and when your response did arrive it took the form of a personal insult. A few days ago you said this: ==+== Slinging names is not the way to keep this debate where it needs to be. Because (...) (23 years ago, 22-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The Sniper Case
|
|
(...) right away, than that we use the rule of law. The public demands it. Why, even John Ashcroft demands it. And we know he's as just, and as smart, and as capable as they come. He's such a keen legal mind, he understood immediately why the (...) (23 years ago, 22-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | The Sniper Case
|
|
Here's an article which does a good job of raising some of the issues I'm concerned with: (URL) (23 years ago, 22-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Q. Where is the USA? A. You are standing on it!
|
|
(...) I suppose that depends on the person, too... My stepfather is miserable in his decision to become an actuary (he hates math and the like), but it's surely more lucrative than other professions he could've followed with a degree in history. In (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Q. Where is the USA? A. You are standing on it!
|
|
(...) A good friend of mine who went to some effort to acheive his PH.D. went immediately through a long-ish period of unemployment because he was "over-qualified" for most jobs he went hunting. He printed up some self-mocking business cards "Thomas (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Q. Where is the USA? A. You are standing on it!
|
|
(...) Here's a word of advice for anyone seeking a liberal arts education: DON'T And if someone tries to B-S you with some spiel about "it's best to have a broad base of education" I urge you to laugh in that person's face and tell him I told you (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Q. Where is the USA? A. You are standing on it!
|
|
(...) I guess it also depends on what you're learning-- I get the sense (From other people I know in the field) that things like Biochemistry and Medicine are a little more fact-oriented than method-oriented. Unlike (in my case) computer (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Q. Where is the USA? A. You are standing on it!
|
|
(...) Maybe you just have overly expensive taste in groceries... Next time you come across such a cashier and your order is $7.78, give him $10.28 and watch his mind melt. (...) That is a fantastic observation! By the end of my fourth semester (my (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Q. Where is the USA? A. You are standing on it!
|
|
(...) One thing which makes me tend not to trust these education surveys is that in the US, almost every child goes through high school, and a huge percentage go to college. In other countries, starting somewhere around the high school age (or even (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: How not to get fired...
|
|
(...) Heh. You're omitting the important part! 8^) You've previously described "smaller tyrannies" as preferable to One Mega Tyranny, and as more beneficial to the flexibility of the marketplace. I have come to agree, and I think it holds for (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: How not to get fired...
|
|
I can't think of many overpaid Government employees, but looking at a picture of the castle that the CEO of Enron is/was having built made me sick. Everywhere in commercial companies there's a handful of fat cats (literally, usually) who just hand (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Q. Where is the USA? A. You are standing on it!
|
|
(...) Haha! That's classic! It would be nice comic relief if those guys showed up in the new Starship RPG... :) -H. (23 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Q. Where is the USA? A. You are standing on it!
|
|
(...) Yeah, we just need to give geography some sex appeal-- then we'll learn it! :) (...) I once knew all the state capitals. Now I remember probably about half of them. I have to admit, though, sometimes I'm suprised to see how many American (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: How not to get fired...
|
|
(...) I think I know who you mean and he certainly wasn't hired by ME, not even a little bit. Nor was his dad, for that matter. (...) Ashcroft? Not sure who you mean, as there are so MANY candidates, unfortunately, that fit the description. (...) I (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Q. Where is the USA? A. You are standing on it!
|
|
Maybe if americans would concentrate more on geography and less on Britney Spears they'd get their 'precision bombing' right the next time... These surveys are not designed to make american kids look stupid. They're just made to test general (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: How not to get fired...
|
|
(...) I can think of one gov't employee I'd really like to see fired, but he was more-or-less hired by his dad. I've worked a number of jobs alongside sons or daughters of the employer, and time and again I've observed their tendency to, let us say, (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: How not to get fired...
|
|
(...) fired (compared to how for profit businesses where employee performance presumably matters) is not the same thing as suggesting that there ought to be a quota(1) on how many people get fired a year in government. The point is that US (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Q. Where is the USA? A. You are standing on it!
|
|
(...) These appalling results were similar in the previous generation. I worked in the mapping business from 1990-1994 and there was no shortage of these articles wringing hands over the un-oriented college students of the 80s. University of (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Q. Where is the USA? A. You are standing on it!
|
|
(...) I think these surveys are specifically geared to make American kids look dumb. They should change the survey. How about "Can you find the nearest Target(R) store on this map?" or "Which beer commercial is better?". Let's see other countries (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Q. Where is the USA? A. You are standing on it!
|
|
(...) I thought this was pertinent: (URL) 11 percent of young citizens of the U.S. couldn't even locate the U.S. on a map. The Pacific Ocean's location was a mystery to 29 percent; Japan, to 58 percent; France, to 65 percent; and the United Kingdom, (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
