To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 18329
18328  |  18330
Subject: 
Re: Vote against/for...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 23 Nov 2002 16:18:24 GMT
Viewed: 
2609 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:

> 1 - meaning that it was the LP ads for our candidate that were credited with
> turning enough voters against Barr that he was defeated in the R primary,
> where he was easier to beat than in the general. I expect that isn't the
> last you'll see of that tactic either. The LP will continue picking off more
> of the worst of the anti civil liberties gang in the GOP, just you watch.
> Expect some action in the Louisiana runoff if I don't miss my bet.

See also this analysis...

http://www.lp.org/lpnews/0301/election.html

(from an admittedly partisan source)

My favorite excerpt:

"It marks the third consecutive election in which a Libertarian has cost the
Republican Party a Senate seat," wrote Miller. "If there had been no
Libertarian Senate candidates in recent years, Republicans would not have
lost control of the chamber in 2001, and a filibuster-proof, 60-seat
majority would likely be within reach."

Think about it. Think about how scary a filibuster proof Senate in the hands
of the GOP (or the Dems, for that matter) would be. To that I say: "you're
welcome"

Quoting LP comm director Getz: "I'll repeat something that I've said before
to Republicans: If you keep your promises, you might keep your jobs."



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Vote against/for...
 
(...) If that's all your party ever wants to aspire to be (a spoiler), then knock yourselves out. But think about this: think about a senate with *no* clear majority and libertarian Republicans controlling the swing votes. That's power. What you (...) (24 years ago, 23-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Vote against/for...
 
(...) Slinging names is not the way to keep this debate where it needs to be. Because when you use even a mild one like "Losertarian" you enable ill mannered rabble rousers to do the same (in kind, but far worse in degree). I find the use of the (...) (24 years ago, 7-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

161 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR