Subject:
|
Re: The Sniper Case
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 22 Nov 2002 21:37:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
434 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
> Here's an article which does a good job of raising some of the issues
> I'm concerned with:
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/11/21/findlaw.analysis.cassel.malvo/index.html
While I agree that Malvo's fate has been overly predetermined by a
prejudiced media, it seems that Cassel (the author) has similarly
predetermined Malvo's "proper" fate. Who is she to say that he should get a
sheltered life in prison rather than a death sentence? I'm not saying I'm
for one result over another, but how can she accuse the legal system being
rigged with a desired, media-formed intent and then immediately present her
own desired intent as "what should happen"? Certainly she raises some good
points; but I think she's too quick to judge Malvo as another teen who was
mistreated by the world who would have otherwise turned into a happy Brady
Bunch kid.
DaveE
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
