To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 14803
14802  |  14804
Subject: 
Re: Slur used in Libertarian fliers (was Re: Fatwah)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 23 Nov 2001 00:45:06 GMT
Viewed: 
822 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:

Having said that, it might be prudent for the LP to state clearly that
Heicklen's a wacko who doesn't represent their views...

I agree with that and would fault them for not doing so.

Them? Surely you mean “us”, or have you resigned your membership?

"Them" in this context are the officers. *I* already repudiated it, so it's
not "us", it's them.

If you
have not, what have you done to correct the situation?

Sent them (the officers) a note about it.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Slur used in Libertarian fliers (was Re: Fatwah)
 
(...) Them? Surely you mean “us”, or have you resigned your membership? If you have not, what have you done to correct the situation? (...) I think it is not a huge issue. But according to my values it is a big deal. Scott A (23 years ago, 20-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

35 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR