To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 14745
14744  |  14746
Subject: 
Re: Slur used in Libertarian fliers (was Re: Fatwah)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 29 Oct 2001 10:39:44 GMT
Viewed: 
635 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
I'm not saying it (the Libertarian Party) is racist.
That proves he's not particularly libertarian, then. Small parties do
sometimes have to take what they can get at local levels but I'd support his
ouster.

Unfortunately these sorts of organizational issues give ammo to foamers
drawing conclusions that are far too broad.

Hmm. Getting rid of critics by calling them names? Are you really an adult?


By the way, the phrase in question is derived from a work that is far older
which also used it for shock value.

http://www.soilandhealth.org/03sovereigntylibrary/0303%20soccriticismlibrary/030301studentasnigger.html

not sure what side of the aisle this author was on. Note that this word is
one that it's apparently OK for some to say but not for others.

Use of the term in this case in the way it was used (I can't be sure, but I
suspect, since I haven't seen the pamplet in question) is indicative of poor
judgement

"poor judgement" which the LP supports.

And that is not just my view:

Racist rhetoric creates negative environment
http://www.collegian.psu.edu/archive/2001/09/09-11-01tdc/09-11-01dops-letter-4.asp
==+==
Despite his claim that his intentions were innocent, I can't understand how
he thought his message would be conveyed as appropriate rather than cruel.
If his objectives were so incorrectly interpreted, why hasn't he or the
political party [the Libertarian Party] he represented issued a retraction?

Although few may support it, the vast majority of the community sees nothing
but racist intent in the literature.
==+==



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Slur used in Libertarian fliers (was Re: Fatwah)
 
(...) is a Libertarian only in name, and his shenanigans are more directed toward his own quest for social martyrdom and sensationalism than about furthering or even disseminating the Libertarian Party's goals or beliefs. It must by now be plainly (...) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Slur used in Libertarian fliers (was Re: Fatwah)
 
(...) Hmm. Getting rid of critics by calling them names? Are you really an adult? (...) "poor judgement" which the LP supports. Scott A but is NOT indicative of being a racist any more (or less) than (...) (23 years ago, 11-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

35 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR