Subject:
|
Re: "White man's club":...another smear by Scott
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Oct 2001 15:28:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
369 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
>
> > I take issue with the implication that my post was filth. 8^)
>
> Any such implication was unintentional and is hereby disclaimed. :-)
For the record, I quoted your post as I remembered it as being a good
summation of the argument, and I still think it is.
So what was it then? An accurate representation?
>
OK. Larry, I shall retract my comment if you can show us that the membership
of the LP is not overwhelmingly disproportionately white. Until then it
stays I'm afraid.
Scott A
BTW your change of subject line has nothing to do with the content of the
message you posted.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: "White man's club":...another smear by Scott
|
| (...) I don't deny demographics. Never did. I deny relevance to message. (...) How convenient, you set the question up so you get to keep using your smear. The term is pejorative and you know it. (...) In fact it does. You are smearing by using the (...) (23 years ago, 9-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
35 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
