To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 14799
14798  |  14800
Subject: 
Re: Slur used in Libertarian fliers (was Re: Fatwah)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 20 Nov 2001 08:20:31 GMT
Viewed: 
708 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:

Having said that, it might be prudent for the LP to state clearly that
Heicklen's a wacko who doesn't represent their views...

I agree with that and would fault them for not doing so.

Them? Surely you mean “us”, or have you resigned your membership? If you
have not, what have you done to correct the situation?

But it's not nearly
the big deal that some make of it.

I think it is not a huge issue. But according to my values it is a big deal.

Scott A



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Slur used in Libertarian fliers (was Re: Fatwah)
 
(...) "Them" in this context are the officers. *I* already repudiated it, so it's not "us", it's them. (...) Sent them (the officers) a note about it. (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Slur used in Libertarian fliers (was Re: Fatwah)
 
(...) I agree with that and would fault them for not doing so. But it's not nearly the big deal that some make of it. (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

35 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR