Debate : 14750


Off-Topic / Debate / 14750	14749 \| 14751

Subject:	Re: Slur used in Libertarian fliers (was Re: Fatwah)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Mon, 19 Nov 2001 20:46:35 GMT
Viewed:	691 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes: > Having said that, it might be prudent for the LP to state clearly that > Heicklen's a wacko who doesn't represent their views... I agree with that and would fault them for not doing so. But it's not nearly the big deal that some make of it.

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: Slur used in Libertarian fliers (was Re: Fatwah)
(...) Agreed. It would be more of a reasonable PR move than a necessary statement of party purity. Harry Browne, for that matter, isn't exactly a paragon of virtue, but that absolutely does not invalidate even a single tenet of the Libertarian (...) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

		Re: Slur used in Libertarian fliers (was Re: Fatwah)
(...) Them? Surely you mean “us”, or have you resigned your membership? If you have not, what have you done to correct the situation? (...) I think it is not a huge issue. But according to my values it is a big deal. Scott A (23 years ago, 20-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Slur used in Libertarian fliers (was Re: Fatwah)
(...) is a Libertarian only in name, and his shenanigans are more directed toward his own quest for social martyrdom and sensationalism than about furthering or even disseminating the Libertarian Party's goals or beliefs. It must by now be plainly (...) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

35 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search