To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 14751
14750  |  14752
Subject: 
Re: Slur used in Libertarian fliers (was Re: Fatwah)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 19 Nov 2001 20:55:33 GMT
Viewed: 
705 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:

Having said that, it might be prudent for the LP to state clearly that
Heicklen's a wacko who doesn't represent their views...

I agree with that and would fault them for not doing so. But it's not nearly
the big deal that some make of it.

  Agreed.  It would be more of a reasonable PR move than a necessary
statement of party purity.  Harry Browne, for that matter, isn't exactly a
paragon of virtue, but that absolutely does *not* invalidate even a single
tenet of the Libertarian Party.

    Dave!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Slur used in Libertarian fliers (was Re: Fatwah)
 
(...) You forgot to point out that you have (to your satisfaction, if not to mine) invalidated some of them through other means, Dave! GRIN. (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Slur used in Libertarian fliers (was Re: Fatwah)
 
(...) I agree with that and would fault them for not doing so. But it's not nearly the big deal that some make of it. (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

35 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR