| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> I need to qualify this a little. The "white man's club" refers to the LP.
> This issue was covered well in a post made by Dave Schuler some time ago:
> http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=10873
Yes, readers not familiar with your sorry "smear by question" tactics ought
to go read the whole thread, in fact.
Calling the LP a "white man's club", with the baggage and implications and
all, is one of your worst smears ever. Shame shame for bringing it up again
but you must be running out of other filth to fling.
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Fatwah
|
| (...) I take issue with the implication that my post was filth. 8^) But I agree that my post was hardly the beginning or end of that thread, so curious readers would do well to explore it further. Dave! (23 years ago, 9-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Fatwah
|
| (...) Shame on your for not aswering the point. Are you to fool to see that you are now smearing me? Don't you like the truth. Lets take a quick look at www.lp.org Take a look at this band-wagon: (URL) bus hijacking shows need for 50-state (...) (23 years ago, 9-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Fatwah
|
| (...) I'm only responding because this refers back to a post that I was at least in part quoted on. Saying the Libertarian party primarily appeals to middle/upper-middle class white males and calling it a "white man's club" are two different things. (...) (23 years ago, 9-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Fatwah
|
| (...) I need to qualify this a little. The "white man's club" refers to the LP. This issue was covered well in a post made by Dave Schuler some time ago: (URL) A (...) (23 years ago, 9-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
35 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
