To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 14755
14754  |  14756
Subject: 
Re: Slur used in Libertarian fliers (was Re: Fatwah)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 19 Nov 2001 21:42:02 GMT
Viewed: 
590 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:

Having said that, it might be prudent for the LP to state clearly that
Heicklen's a wacko who doesn't represent their views...

I agree with that and would fault them for not doing so. But it's not nearly
the big deal that some make of it.

Agreed.  It would be more of a reasonable PR move than a necessary
statement of party purity.  Harry Browne, for that matter, isn't exactly a
paragon of virtue, but that absolutely does *not* invalidate even a single
tenet of the Libertarian Party.

   Dave!

You forgot to point out that you have (to your satisfaction, if not to mine)
invalidated some of them through other means, Dave! GRIN.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Slur used in Libertarian fliers (was Re: Fatwah)
 
(...) Agreed. It would be more of a reasonable PR move than a necessary statement of party purity. Harry Browne, for that matter, isn't exactly a paragon of virtue, but that absolutely does *not* invalidate even a single tenet of the Libertarian (...) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

35 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR