To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 14755
14754  |  14756
Subject: 
Re: Slur used in Libertarian fliers (was Re: Fatwah)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 19 Nov 2001 21:42:02 GMT
Viewed: 
2165 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> > 
> > >  Having said that, it might be prudent for the LP to state clearly that
> > > Heicklen's a wacko who doesn't represent their views...
> > 
> > I agree with that and would fault them for not doing so. But it's not nearly
> > the big deal that some make of it.
> 
>  Agreed.  It would be more of a reasonable PR move than a necessary
> statement of party purity.  Harry Browne, for that matter, isn't exactly a
> paragon of virtue, but that absolutely does *not* invalidate even a single
> tenet of the Libertarian Party.
> 
>    Dave!

You forgot to point out that you have (to your satisfaction, if not to mine)
invalidated some of them through other means, Dave! GRIN.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Slur used in Libertarian fliers (was Re: Fatwah)
 
(...) Agreed. It would be more of a reasonable PR move than a necessary statement of party purity. Harry Browne, for that matter, isn't exactly a paragon of virtue, but that absolutely does *not* invalidate even a single tenet of the Libertarian (...) (25 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

35 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR