Subject:
|
This really is a low form of debate
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 14 Oct 2001 11:06:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
284 times
|
| |
|
|
> I am going to try to take Davids advice and, except where it is critical to
> do so because you are egregiously slurring (a kind of lie, by the way) or
> lieing or misrepresenting, ignore you. Said it before, but I'm going to try.
Larry, I can't believe you are calling be a liar again. This really is a low
form of debate. Give an example of were I have lied. I challenge you. Do it
or apologise. If I have lied, I will apologise.
Once you have done that, answer these:
Re: Put up - or shut up.
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=13829
What, no answer?
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=13828
Re: PA censoring journalists again, but repudiating bin Laden...
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=13826
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: This really is a low form of debate
|
| (...) If lieing includes distorting the truth by omission, deliberately using pejorative terms to leave unfavorable impressions of situations and people, and in general playing fast and loose with the truth as it suits your whim, then I give you no (...) (23 years ago, 14-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
49 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
