Subject:
|
Re: Liberterian comes through for the Bill of Rights (was a slur
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 12 Oct 2001 15:12:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
244 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > Oh, and another thing, before you accuse others of calling names, you might
> > want to avoid doing the same yourself, your subject line is a deliberate
> > slur... unbacked by any fact
>
> I'm not sure about that. It looks like the guy is a liiberterian (do you
> dispute that?)
No. In fact we had a dustup in the past about whether he was or not and I
was saying he was.
> and that this bill may help catch the bad guys (do you
> dispute that?).
Yes I do dispute that. And even if it does help, which I dispute, it's not
necessarily a good idea.
We *could* pass a law requiring all airline passengers to travel completely
naked with all baggage checked, which might help stop hijackings but that
doesn't make it a good idea, or aligned with the bill or rights. And
opposing stupid bills does not make you pro terrorist. Saying so is a
deliberate slur.
Unless you are ok with me saying YOU are pro-terrorist because you oppose
LEGO's charity decisions and would rather they chose something more to your
personal liking? That's just as unfounded of a label.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
49 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
