To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 13850
13849  |  13851
Subject: 
Re: Liberterian comes through for the Bill of Rights (was a slur
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 12 Oct 2001 16:29:08 GMT
Viewed: 
717 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
Oh, and another thing, before you accuse others of calling names, you might
want to avoid doing the same yourself, your subject line is a deliberate
slur... unbacked by any fact

I'm not sure about that. It looks like the guy is a libertarian (do you
dispute that?)

No. In fact we had a dustup in the past about whether he was or not and I
was saying he was.

and that this bill may help catch the bad guys (do you
dispute that?).

Yes I do dispute that.

On what grounds?

On the grounds that it may well be a flawed bill. I haven't found an article
that cites which bill it is so it could be any of these:

(from http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query)

50 Bills from the 107th Congress ranked by relevance on"money laundering ".

       42 bills containing your phrase exactly as entered.
       0 bills containing all your search words near each other in any order.
       8 bills containing all your search words but not near each other.
       0 bills containing one or more of your search words.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Listing of 42 bills containing your phrase exactly as entered.

1 . International Counter-Money Laundering and Foreign Anticorruption Act of
2001 (Introduced in the House)[H.R.1114.IH]
2 . International Counter-Money Laundering and Foreign Anticorruption Act of
2001 (Introduced in the Senate)[S.398.IS]
3 . International Money Laundering Abatement and Anti-Terrorist Financing
Act of 2001 (Placed on the Calendar in the Senate)[S.1511.PCS]
4 . Money Laundering Prevention Act (Introduced in the House)[H.R.2978.IH]
5 . Money Laundering Abatement Act (Introduced in the Senate)[S.1371.IS]
6 . Money Laundering Act of 2001 (Introduced in the House)[H.R.2979.IH]
7 . Financial Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001 (Introduced in the House)[H.R.3004.IH]
8 . USA Act of 2001 (Introduced in the Senate)[S.1510.IS]
9 . USA Act of 2001 (Placed on the Calendar in the Senate)[S.1510.PCS]
10 . Internet Gambling Payments Prohibition Act (Introduced in the
House)[H.R.2579.IH]
11 . Unlawful Internet Gambling Funding Prohibition Act (Introduced in the
House)[H.R.556.IH]
12 . To authorize the production of records by the Permanent Subcommittee on
Investigations of the Committee on Governmental Affairs. (Agreed to by the
Senate)[S.RES.77.ATS]
13 . Bulk Cash Smuggling Act of 2001 (Introduced in the House)[H.R.2920.IH]
14 . Bulk Cash Smuggling Act of 2001 (Introduced in the House)[H.R.2922.IH]
15 . To suspend for two years the certification procedures under section
490(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 in order to foster greater
multilateral cooperation in international... (Reported in the Senate)[S.219.RS]
16 . To authorize additional appropriations for the United States Customs
Service for personnel, technology, and infrastructure to expedite the flow
of legal commercial and passenger traffic... (Introduced in the
Senate)[S.1031.IS]
17 . To authorize additional appropriations for the United States Customs
Service for personnel, technology, and infrastructure to expedite the flow
of legal commercial and passenger traffic... (Introduced in the
House)[H.R.2512.IH]
18 . To amend the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to modify for fiscal years
2002 through 2004 the procedures relating to assistance for countries not
cooperating in United States counterdrug... (Introduced in the Senate)[S.376.IS]
19 . To provide that a certification of the cooperation of Mexico with
United States counterdrug efforts not be required in fiscal year 2001 for
the limitation on assistance for Mexico under... (Introduced in the
Senate)[S.353.IS]
20 . To suspend for two years the certification procedures under section
490(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 in order to foster greater
multilateral cooperation in international... (Introduced in the
House)[H.R.841.IH]
21 . Whereas Vicente Fox Quesada of the Alliance for Change (consisting of
the National Action Party and the Mexican Green Party) was sworn in as
President of the United Mexican States on... (Engrossed in
Senate)[S.CON.RES.13.ES]
22 . Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to the upcoming trip of
President George W. Bush to Mexico to meet with newly elected President
Vicente Fox, and with respect to future... (Referred in House)[S.CON.RES.13.RFH]
23 . Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to the upcoming trip of
President George W. Bush to Mexico to meet with newly elected President
Vicente Fox, and with respect to future... (Introduced in the
House)[H.CON.RES.35.IH]
24 . Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to the upcoming trip of
President George W. Bush to Mexico to meet with newly elected President
Vicente Fox, and with respect to future... (Agreed to by the
Senate)[S.CON.RES.13.ATS]
25 . To suspend for two years the certification procedures under section
490(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 in order to foster greater
multilateral cooperation in international... (Introduced in the
Senate)[S.219.IS]
26 . 21st Century Law Enforcement, Crime Prevention, and Victims Assistance
Act (Introduced in the Senate)[S.16.IS]
27 . SOLIDARIDAD Act of 2001 (Introduced in the Senate)[S.894.IS]
28 . Financial Privacy and National Security Enhancement Act (Introduced in
the House)[H.R.3068.IH]
29 . Caribbean Regional Assistance Act of 2001 (Introduced in the
House)[H.R.502.IH]
30 . Clean Diamonds Act (Introduced in the House)[H.R.918.IH]
31 . Russian Democracy Act of 2001 (Introduced in the House)[H.R.2121.IH]
32 . Drug-Free America Act of 2001 (Introduced in the Senate)[S.89.IS]
33 . Provide Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism
(PATRIOT) Act of 2001 (Reported in the House)[H.R.2975.RH]
34 . Amateur Sports Integrity Act (Reported in the Senate)[S.718.RS]
35 . Financial Information Privacy Protection Act of 2001 (Introduced in the
Senate)[S.30.IS]
36 . Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2002 (Referred in
Senate)[H.R.2590.RFS]
37 . Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2002 (Engrossed in
House )[H.R.2590.EH]
38 . Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2002 (Placed on the
Calendar in the Senate)[S.1398.PCS]
39 . Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2002 (Reported in
the House)[H.R.2590.RH]
40 . Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 2002 and 2003 (Placed
on the Calendar in the Senate)[S.1401.PCS]
41 . Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2002 (Engrossed
Senate Amendment)[H.R.2590.EAS]
42 . Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2002 (Public
Print)[H.R.2590.PP]


or even some bill that doesn't have Money Laundering in it somewhere.

If YOU know which one it is exactly I'll analyse it in depth. Till then, I
tend to trust Ron Paul's judgement on this more than yours, since I don't
have time to read all 42 to see which one it is.

And even if it does help, which I dispute, it's not
necessarily a good idea.

We *could* pass a law requiring all airline passengers to travel completely
naked with all baggage checked, which might help stop hijackings but that
doesn't make it a good idea, or aligned with the bill or rights.

You are being silly.

See, this is why I get high marks in Debating skills on Dave's score card
and you came nowhere near that. I've given an example of a law that CLEARLY
would help stop hijackings. After all, it denies the terrorist a place to
hide his weapons (or bomb control remote). Do you dispute that it would help
stop hijackings to require nudity? If so, please explain.

But it's a *silly* idea. That was the *point*... it stops a class of
hijackings (the class that required a weapon concealed on your person) yet
it *nevertheless* is unconstitutional and is a *bad idea*.

Your best argument against my demonstrating the principle that not all bills
that accomplish X are necessarily a good idea even if accomplishing X is
itself a good idea or desirable goal... your best argument against that...
is to slur me by saying "you are being silly".

Hardly.

And
opposing stupid bills does not make you pro terrorist.

I'm not saying that. I don't want to speak for Ed, but I don't think he is
either.

Yes, he did, see the original subject line.

Saying so is a
deliberate slur.

Unless you are ok with me saying YOU are pro-terrorist because you oppose
LEGO's charity decisions and would rather they chose something more to your
personal liking? That's just as unfounded of a label.

Again, your poor debating skills and poor reading comprehension shine
through clearly. I gave an example of something that would be an unfounded
label and what do you do? Instead of agreeing that it's an unfounded label,
you defend the action. You missed the point. Again.

Read more carefully.

Think before speaking.

Don't always post 3 different half baked responses to the same post and then
beat up those that don't respond to each and every post of yours.

I am going to try to take Davids advice and, except where it is critical to
do so because you are egregiously slurring (a kind of lie, by the way) or
lieing or misrepresenting, ignore you. Said it before, but I'm going to try.

++:Lar



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Liberterian comes through for the Bill of Rights (was a slur
 
(...) "may well" is not "is" (...) So you have no basis for *your* mudslinging??? Have you no shame? (...) Why do we want to stop hijackings? To protect life and commerce? Your proposal will not do the latter. (...) You were taking a principle to (...) (23 years ago, 14-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  This really is a low form of debate
 
(...) Larry, I can't believe you are calling be a liar again. This really is a low form of debate. Give an example of were I have lied. I challenge you. Do it or apologise. If I have lied, I will apologise. Once you have done that, answer these: Re: (...) (23 years ago, 14-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Liberterian comes through for the Bill of Rights (was a slur
 
(...) On what grounds? (...) You are being silly. (...) I'm not saying that. I don't want to speak for Ed, but I don't think he is either. (...) 1. You are lacking logic. If Lego did not list those items but just give some $$ with no fuss, how would (...) (23 years ago, 12-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

49 Messages in This Thread:

















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR