Subject:
|
Re: Libertarian comes through for the Terrorists
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 12 Oct 2001 14:29:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
146 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ed "Boxer" Jones writes:
> Why am I not surprised:
>
> "Under White House prodding, a House panel on Thursday approved legislation
> to further expand the government's ability to cut money flows to terrorist
> networks. A parallel bill is part of Bush's sweeping anti-terrorism package
> in the Senate.
>
> The 62-1 vote by the House Financial Services Committee sent the measure to
> the full House. The lone dissenting vote came from Rep. Ron Paul (news - bio
> - voting record), R-Texas, a staunch libertarian."
>
> From: http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20011012/ts/terrorist_money_5.html
There is a big difference between supporting terrorists or their ideolog - i.e.,
"coming through for them" and dissenting against a bill that you feel is not
appropriate or effective for X reasons. Ed, do you know why he voted against
that bill? Why do some homework before slinging mud?
james
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Libertarian comes through for the Terrorists
|
| Why am I not surprised: "Under White House prodding, a House panel on Thursday approved legislation to further expand the government's ability to cut money flows to terrorist networks. A parallel bill is part of Bush's sweeping anti-terrorism (...) (23 years ago, 12-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
49 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
