Subject:
|
Re: Libertarian comes through for the Terrorists
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 13 Oct 2001 14:50:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
389 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ed Jones writes:
<snip>
> Hmm... history would state otherwise. I'll cite one example. During WWII
> and the Korean War, correspondence from families to their sons in action was
> routinely perused. Illegal breach of privacy - defintiely. Necessary -
> absolutely.
This is not a good example.
In the U.S. military, any "freedom" allotted, is merely a luxury.
This from my own personnal experiance in the U.S. Navy for four years.
Life in the service is anything but "private".
service in the armed forces is a voluntary forfeiture of civil liberties and
rights.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Libertarian comes through for the Terrorists
|
| (...) I do not have a cite for the bill numebr, but it is summarized here: (URL)Do you seriously want every bill that comes up that vaguely claims to be (...) Of course not, however, this bill is "terrorism" specific. (...) In actuality, the Money (...) (23 years ago, 12-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
49 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
