Subject:
|
He doesn't have the humility to admit when he's wrong.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 15 Oct 2001 07:38:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
386 times
|
| |
| |
Larry,
You are becoming a parody of yourself. The is typical of you, rather than
answer the point you make a lot of noise and sling some mud.
I shall ask you again. Give an example of were I have lied. I challenge you.
Do it or apologise. If I have lied, I will apologise.
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > I am going to try to take Davids advice and, except where it is critical to
> > > do so because you are egregiously slurring (a kind of lie, by the way) or
> > > lieing or misrepresenting, ignore you. Said it before, but I'm going to try.
> >
> > Larry, I can't believe you are calling be a liar again. This really is a low
> > form of debate. Give an example of were I have lied. I challenge you. Do it
> > or apologise. If I have lied, I will apologise.
>
> If lieing includes distorting the truth by omission, deliberately using
> pejorative terms to leave unfavorable impressions of situations and people,
> and in general playing fast and loose with the truth as it suits your whim,
> then I give you no apology, and in fact you owe one.
>
> If lieing is strictly defined as directly asserting something counterfactual
> to be true, and nothing else, then you have my apology as I am too lazy to
> go sifting through all of your posts to catch you out. Reserving the right
> to do so later, of course.
>
> So I apologise for calling you a liar and not backing it up with cites of
> direct assertions of strict counterfact. You're still a chump, though.
>
> <snip rebludgeons>
>
> These have all been addressed to my satisfaction.
ie NOT addressed.
"There is no expedient to which a man will not go to avoid the labor of
thinking." (Edison)
Scott A
> If not to yours, tough.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: This really is a low form of debate
|
| (...) If lieing includes distorting the truth by omission, deliberately using pejorative terms to leave unfavorable impressions of situations and people, and in general playing fast and loose with the truth as it suits your whim, then I give you no (...) (23 years ago, 14-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
49 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|