To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 6007
6006  |  6008
Subject: 
Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Tue, 3 Aug 1999 19:15:26 GMT
Viewed: 
972 times
  
In lugnet.general, Matthew Miller writes:
Greg Williams <gregw@mindspring.com> wrote:
"The LEGO Group is not responsible for lost, illegible, mutilated or
misdirected entries. There is no limit on the number of entries submitted. • [snip]
The misdirected entry part is what I'm wondering about.  Or does it mean
that it isn't their fault if someone submits a someone else's model.  I also

Given the context, I think "misdirected" means it's not TLG's fault if some
kid puts the wrong address on their envelope.

Or that the Postal Service delivers it to the wrong address I would think.
Ben Gatrelle



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?
 
(...) [snip] (...) Given the context, I think "misdirected" means it's not TLG's fault if some kid puts the wrong address on their envelope. (25 years ago, 2-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)

50 Messages in This Thread:



















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR