To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 5963
5962  |  5964
Subject: 
Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Mon, 2 Aug 1999 12:59:41 GMT
Reply-To: 
mattdm@mattdm.orgSTOPSPAMMERS
Viewed: 
769 times
  
Greg Williams <gregw@mindspring.com> wrote:
"The LEGO Group is not responsible for lost, illegible, mutilated or
misdirected entries. There is no limit on the number of entries submitted. • [snip]
The misdirected entry part is what I'm wondering about.  Or does it mean
that it isn't their fault if someone submits a someone else's model.  I also

Given the context, I think "misdirected" means it's not TLG's fault if some
kid puts the wrong address on their envelope.


--
Matthew Miller                      --->                  mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us                       --->             http://quotes-r-us.org/



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?
 
(...) Or that the Postal Service delivers it to the wrong address I would think. Ben Gatrelle (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?
 
Yikes! Thanks, Todd, for pointing me to this thread. I admit I haven't been keeping up with lugnet lately. That is indeed my APC model on the LEGO website. However, after reading the rules I wonder if LEGO will do anything. Here's an excerpt: "The (...) (25 years ago, 2-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)

50 Messages in This Thread:



















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR