Subject:
|
Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 26 Jan 2000 15:49:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
986 times
|
| |
|
|
Tony Priestman wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Mookie (<388E6181.28DD3F5B@worldnet.att.net>)
> wrote at 02:52:49
>
> > Though I think there
> > should have to be some kind of signed "legally" binding agreement
> > that needs to be signed by a parent for anyone under 18 submitting
> > items to the vote. The parents will know if the kid really built
> > something 90% of the time I would think...
>
> I haven't looked, so I can't comment on the rules, but rather than
> getting all formal, they could just say that the submission must
> include a picture of the submitter *with* their creation, as well as
> any other pictures.
I thought about suggesting that, but I dismissed it as a bad idea, as
it might attract kidnappers or child pornographers or something.
--
Susan Hoover
Houston, TX
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?)
|
| On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Susan Hoover (<8EC76843Erumplestx...8.63.236>) wrote at 15:49:58 (...) Well, they wouldn't have to display the 'proof' picture, just have it as evidence. One would hope that they've got internal procedures for stuff like (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?)
|
| On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Mookie (<388E6181.28DD3F5B@....att.net>) wrote at 02:52:49 (...) I haven't looked, so I can't comment on the rules, but rather than getting all formal, they could just say that the submission must include a picture of the (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
50 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
