Subject:
|
Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 27 Jan 2000 17:14:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1093 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> Mookie wrote:
>
> > I would say more cost effective than having lawyers sic'd on em.. The
> > way they get about someone invading their rights, they should expect the
> > same from someone who's rights they violate with this.
>
> I don't want to start a range war or anything but I DO want to say that,
> whatever TLC's other faults, I don't see their lawyers as NEARLY as bad
> as a lot of other firms. I really feel their fair play policy is a model
> of reasonableness and we are pretty lucky compared to some other fen of
> other stuff who get beat up on a regular basis. Brickshelf strikes me as
> something that a lot of other companies would go absolutely ballistic
> over, yet we have reason to believe that TLC not only tolerates it, but
> actually condones it and in a few cases, even supports it.
That's true--I wasn't very precise in wording my earlier post, either. TLC
lawyers are indeed remarkably cool about web-posting images and scans. I was
referring more to materials that they decide are "off limits" and the vigor
with which they defend those materials. Not that they're out of line in doing
so, since it's theirs; I'm just uncomfortable with their tepid response when
someone else makes a similar assertion.
> Having said that, their response to Susan was limp in the extreme and
> needs to be fixed, pronto.
Amen!
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?)
|
| (...) I don't want to start a range war or anything but I DO want to say that, whatever TLC's other faults, I don't see their lawyers as NEARLY as bad as a lot of other firms. I really feel their fair play policy is a model of reasonableness and we (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
50 Messages in This Thread: ![Can we say, "Plagiarism"? -Greg Majewski (1-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"? -Troy Cefaratti (2-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"? -Greg Majewski (2-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"? -Troy Cefaratti (2-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"? -Mark Haye (3-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"? -Greg Williams (3-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"? -David Simmons (2-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"? -Patricia Schempp (2-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"? -Julie Krenz (2-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"? -Patricia Schempp (2-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"? -Patricia Schempp (2-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"? -Greg Williams (2-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"? -Matthew Miller (2-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"? -Ben Gatrelle (3-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"? -Ben Roller (2-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"? -John Morgan (2-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"? -Bryce McGlone (3-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Susan Hoover (21-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Tamyra Teed (21-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Frank Filz (21-Jan-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Doug Dropeskey (23-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Larry Pieniazek (24-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Susan Hoover (25-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Tamyra Teed (26-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Tony Priestman (26-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Susan Hoover (26-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Tony Priestman (26-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Richard Franks (27-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Tony Priestman (27-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Dave Schuler (27-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Tamyra Teed (27-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Mike Poindexter (27-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Frank Filz (27-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Larry Pieniazek (27-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Bang Bang (was Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Larry Pieniazek (27-Jan-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Bang Bang (was Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Dave Schuler (27-Jan-00 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Susan Hoover (26-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Frank Filz (26-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Doug Dropeskey (27-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Dave Schuler (27-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Jonathan Wilson (28-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Jeff Johnston (28-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Steve Hodge (29-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Colin Gutierrez (29-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Troy Cefaratti (31-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) -Susan Hoover (25-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Resolved! (Was: Plagiarism again) -Susan Hoover (29-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Resolved! (Was: Plagiarism again) -Charles Eric McCarthy (29-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Resolved! (Was: Plagiarism again) -Susan Hoover (31-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|