Subject:
|
Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 Aug 1999 11:32:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
825 times
|
| |
|
|
Yikes! Thanks, Todd, for pointing me to this thread. I admit I haven't
been keeping up with lugnet lately. That is indeed my APC model on the LEGO
website. However, after reading the rules I wonder if LEGO will do
anything. Here's an excerpt:
"The LEGO Group is not responsible for lost, illegible, mutilated or
misdirected entries. There is no limit on the number of entries submitted.
All
entries shall be the copyright of the LEGO Group and none will be
returned. Personal data will only be used in connection with the Builders
Gallery and will be destroyed when the winner of the month (Hall of Fame)
has been selected."
The misdirected entry part is what I'm wondering about. Or does it mean
that it isn't their fault if someone submits a someone else's model. I also
can't find an email address on the LEGO site to send in a complaint or
anyway to contact the member who submitted the model. Anyone got any clues
on what I can do?
I'm flattered it is in first place. :-)
Greg Majewski <citrusx__@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:FFt8o3.87z@lugnet.com...
> Hello,
> While going through some of the current official Lego design contest • entries
> held on their site, I came across a startling discovery: The model in • first
> place has been on the web for as long as I can remember, and it also • belongs to
> Mr. Greg Williams. However, it says on lego.com that it was made by some • 10
> year old kid. I invite you all to go to this link,
> http://www.mindspring.com/~gregw/images/apc-left.jpg , and tell me that • the
> model in first place on www.lego.com is not the same thing. If any Lego
> employee or site maintainer or something is reading this, I ask you to • please
> regard this message. Either remove the model from your contest all • together, or
> give proper credit to its rightful creator.
> Greg Majewski
> citrusx__@yahoo.com
> http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Dome/1888/
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?
|
| (...) So, does this mean that your model now belongs to them? Oh, and they won't give it back. :) Mostly kidding, Ben Roller P.S. I tend to agree that misdirected entry means something near "lost in the mail", but who knows. (25 years ago, 2-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | Re: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?
|
| In lugnet.general, Greg Williams writes: you could call Lego Shop @ home and ask to speak to somone in consumer affiars( I think this is the correct name) I was told about this while placing an order. I had asked the question as to why the service (...) (25 years ago, 2-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Can we say, "Plagiarism"?
|
| Hello, While going through some of the current official Lego design contest entries held on their site, I came across a startling discovery: The model in first place has been on the web for as long as I can remember, and it also belongs to Mr. Greg (...) (25 years ago, 1-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
50 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
