Subject:
|
Re: What is a "review"?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 11:18:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1843 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Frank Filz writes:
> To a large extent, it's probably just a case of who happened to see your
> words. Of course some of us may hold someone who creates a review site
> to a higher standard than someone who posts a review every once in a
> while in lugnet.reviews.
I would lambaste anyone (in a gentle way, of course, I'm all sweetness and
light) posting a formal review to lugnet.reviews who hadn't bought the set
as well....
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: What is a "review"?
|
| (...) I know I'm jumping late, but this whole thing reminded me of an incident concerning an arts critic for one of the big two San Francisco papers a few years back. He wrote a review of the opening night performance of a play or ballet or (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: What is a "review"?
|
| (...) fraud is just another word for thief (at least in my book, and I'm guessing Larry's also). (...) ePinion? Nah, probably overused. How about "My Impressions of LEGO Sets" or something along those lines. (...) I don't know, I've found plenty to (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)
|
63 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
