To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 35052
35051  |  35053
Subject: 
Re: Expert Builder website - Great response results in first update
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 01:29:11 GMT
Viewed: 
1429 times
  
In lugnet.general, Allan Bedford writes:
In lugnet.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
But why dilute a powerful message by using propaganda tricks?

Because I'm tired of the compartmentalized views found elsewhere.  I'm
trying something new.  I'm ranting outside the box.  I'm willing to look
like an idiot if it will make even one person pay attention.

Your message
is better than that. You don't need to lie.

I am not sure why you'd say I lied.

You said "the same effect could have been achieved with simple traditional
2x2 bricks". That is not true.

The review is my opinion.  My opinion
is that those columns aren't worthy of the LEGO name.

This is a side issue to the truth and fairness of your reviews, but I'd like
to know why you think they aren't worthy of the LEGO name. They are made of
the traditional material, interact in various ways with other components,
and expand the building possibilities of other components.

Please disagree with
me, but I find it worrisome that you'd call me a lier.

Go borrow a set and give an
honest review and the facts will speak for themselves.

Borrow a set from whom?  I don't know anyone who'd waste their money on it.
All the sets around here are still sitting on store shelves.

What you do now destroys whatever credibility you might have with many.

I have no credibility Larry, therefore nothing to loose.  My review is
nothing worse (in fact it's milder) than some things I've posted to this
website.  If I had a shred of credibility, I'm sure it's gone.  This is just
about making a message heard.  If the messanger gets mocked doing so, then
I'll take that.

But if the messenger has no credibility, rants, looks like an idiot, uses
propaganda tricks and expounds untruths, don't you think the message might
just get lost in the noise?

Richie Dulin



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Expert Builder website - Great response results in first update
 
(...) I said that "the same effect could have been achieved". The effect of a white column. The effect of a building that looks like an elevator shaft. The effect of a building with no walls. What I didn't say was that you could make the "exact same (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)
  Re: Expert Builder website - Great response results in first update
 
(...) And this differs from most news media how...? I think what's interesting about this discussion is the degree to which we have mythologized the idea of, and even the methods of arriving at, the "truth." -- Hop-Frog (22 years ago, 9-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Expert Builder website - Great response results in first update
 
(...) Is this referring to me? If so, I'm not sure what you mean by it. (...) Because I'm tired of the compartmentalized views found elsewhere. I'm trying something new. I'm ranting outside the box. I'm willing to look like an idiot if it will make (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)

63 Messages in This Thread:



















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR