To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 35064
35063  |  35065
Subject: 
Re: Expert Builder website - Great response results in first update
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Followup-To: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 03:54:24 GMT
Viewed: 
1425 times
  
In lugnet.general, Allan Bedford writes:
[snip]
Hey, I'll take that.  I have broad shoulders and a good sense of humor.  I
really thought more people would see that.  I went back just a few minutes
ago and reread my own review of the Jack Stone set.

I say a lot worse things than just my comments on the columns.

Worse in what way?

The criticism isn't of your comments on the columns isn't that you said
(paraphrasing) "the column is bad", it's that you said (again paraphrasing)
"the column could be subsitituted by a stack of 2x2 bricks" when that is not
the case.

And the overall criticism of your "review" isn't that you said the set was
bad, but that you called it a review when you had not built the set.

Do you see the differences?

Richie Dulin

FUT lugnet.off-topic.debate - it's not about LEGO, it's about honesty.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Expert Builder website - Great response results in first update
 
(...) I don't see this thread as a flamewar... at least I hope it's not becoming that. I'm trying to respond to everyone's concerns over this 'column' incident by reminding people that they are already participating in a site that generally embraces (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)

63 Messages in This Thread:



















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR