Subject:
|
Re: Bulk Ordering - Secrets Revealed.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 20 Sep 2000 03:23:40 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm%SayNoToSpam%.org
|
Viewed:
|
2932 times
|
| |
|
|
Frank Filz <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote:
> result in it even being possible that the LEGO mold costs LESS than the mold
> Robert describes. That would also suggest some of why the sets with SPUDs cost
> significantly more, they don't get the same volume efficiencies in the whole
> molding process.
Which begs the question: why not make less SPUDs?
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Bulk Ordering - Secrets Revealed.
|
| (...) cost (...) Because they believe (and I partially agree) that SPUDs can allow them to produce sets which have more substance to them (in the form of larger constructions) for a given production cost. Take a triangular BURP for example, to build (...) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Bulk Ordering - Secrets Revealed.
|
| (...) Somehow I doubt it. If it actually cost a penny a brick for the MOLD, there is no way that the cost per part for a set would be 10-20 cents, and certainly no way that you could sell tubs for close to a penny a part. What's possible is that the (...) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.general)
|
60 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
