 | | Re: Need (working) program to generate instruction pictures
|
|
(...) [...] (...) Oh, I thought you got no model displayed when launching the Mac bundle. I figured that with the environment.plist file, you'd at least get the the model displayed. On my old PowerBook I used this as a environment.plist <?xml (...) (18 years ago, 4-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: Need (working) program to generate instruction pictures
|
|
(...) I haven't followed all of this, but I suspect this is probably a driver issue. Ldglite is getting pretty old. It's so old that when I wrote the opengl bits the hardware (and software opengl) of the time was typically unable to render the model (...) (18 years ago, 4-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Authors: opinions sought on T-Junctions
|
|
(...) This is a really old issue. I think the previous consensus was that (URL) T-Junctions are bad.> Look at the bottom of the message for the comments on T-Junctions. Actually this is such an old issue, I could swear there was an ASCII art (...) (18 years ago, 4-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView error
|
|
"Travis Cobbs" <tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com> schreef in bericht news:JECt3F.ED0@lugnet.com... (...) Which is indeed true. The GF2 was not MX. (...) This is dissappointing... I assumed a GF4 would be better on all fronts than an GF2. (...) Thanks (...) (18 years ago, 4-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Need (working) program to generate instruction pictures
|
|
(...) OK. I've set up a proper .MacOSX/environment.plist now, but I can't see that it's made any difference. The [mis]behavior is the same. This and the video information your provided supports my gut feeling that the problem is limited to the (...) (18 years ago, 4-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Naming of Parts (esp. Wheels & Tires)
|
|
Hi, Perhaps it is just me, but I am often confused when trying to find matching parts. For example, there is a wheel center 50944 or 42610, which is named 11 x 6 mm. In fact it is 11.2 x 6.4 mm which also more fits to LEGO dimensions. That is not (...) (18 years ago, 4-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Authors: opinions sought on T-Junctions
|
|
(...) in all the parts I've made so far there is just one with a t-junction: (URL) (if I remember correctly it's where the two red quads are surrounded by the white border) but it is forgiveable I think, as it was one of the first parts I've ever (...) (18 years ago, 4-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Need (working) program to generate instruction pictures
|
|
(...) Jim, I'm not a programmer, but as it was explained to me by Don Heyse, that the only way for a double-clickable Mac application to get information about unix-like environment variables is if that variable is specified in a file called (...) (18 years ago, 4-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Authors: opinions sought on T-Junctions
|
|
(...) It's possible that by setting up meshes POVray can largely avoid the problem as it rotates points and then joins them. My opinion is that Part Authors should stick to keeping the polygon count down rather than jumping through hoops to try to (...) (18 years ago, 4-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Part Authors: opinions sought on T-Junctions
|
|
If you are a part author, I'd appreciate it if you read this post. I know it's long, but it needs to be in order to correctly describe the issue. When looking at one one of the parts in the inaugural Part of the Month contest in LDView (on my work (...) (18 years ago, 4-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Need (working) program to generate instruction pictures
|
|
(...) Hmm. I'm curious how it works on your machine. There's not a problem with my LDraw directory or $LDRAWDIR definition; it's an environment variable, regardless of where it's defined. The problem isn't with the LDraw parts, its with the visible (...) (18 years ago, 4-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: Need (working) program to generate instruction pictures
|
|
(...) Odd... one of the first things I did was check to see if LDGLite worked on my MacBook, and it worked without a problem. My first guesses are that your LDRAW dir didn't get copied over from your old computer, and/or your (...) (18 years ago, 4-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView error
|
|
(...) I don't know off-hand the performance characteristics of those two cards, but if your GF2 wasn't an MX, then it's actually possible that the new card is actually slower at geometry processing (despite being two full generations newer). In (...) (18 years ago, 4-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: colors completeness
|
|
(...) I believe that the (now nearly mythical) "next version" of L3P has been announced to support ldconfig.ldr. --Travis (18 years ago, 4-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Need (working) program to generate instruction pictures
|
|
(...) If you want, I can send you an alpha-quality Intel Mac binary of LDView 3.2, which can render the files (even from the command line), but I don't think it will be any easier to use than ldglite if you get ldglite to work. LDView doesn't (...) (18 years ago, 4-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView error
|
|
Presuming you have the very latest drivers installed (your best bet is to use nVidia installers to repair things wholesale, rather than try to navigate at the individual .DLL level), then I might suggest that you have all the "goodies" (...) (18 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView error
|
|
My problem was solved by downloading a dll file nvoglnt.dll. It turned out my version was 0 kb !? The strange thing however is that LDView renders slower than my GF2 card??? "Jaco van der Molen" <jmolen@zonnet.nl> schreef in bericht (...) (18 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: colors completeness
|
|
(...) Ahhhh. My apologies. It's been ages since I tried so that is probably what happened. The end result is that I can't apply my own bley definitions (yes the numbers are right) which is probably why I thought they were deleted. Tim (18 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: colors completeness
|
|
(...) You mean that a (URL) color 71 or 72> brick goes into L3P and nothing comes out? Unless I've got the wrong grey (quite possible; bley genealogy bores me), L3P complains and applies the default color, but it doesn't remove the the part from the (...) (18 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | LDView error
|
|
Hi all, Since I installed a new videocard (NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440 with AGP8X) I seem to be unable to run LDView. Why is that? My previous NVIDIA GeForce2 card did not give any problems. Can this be resolved? Thanks. Jaco (18 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: colors completeness
|
|
(...) I've been making an effort recently to demonstrate that LDView (including the development version, 3.2) will work on the Mac. Although LDView 3.2 itself is, as you emphasize, unreleased, the source code is available, so I've been trying to (...) (18 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!
|
|
(...) Absolutely. But until such time as a program like that is available, I'm most interested in what can be done pragmatically with the tools available now. I've probably just confused the discussion of plans for future improvements - in which (...) (18 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!
|
|
(...) Well I would argue that is forcing the user to do something the program could do much more easily (and accurately). Both those make the assumption that the contents of the standard LDraw directory are always official, and the contents of the (...) (18 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: colors completeness
|
|
(...) Then I would definitely recommend LDView for the rendering chain. I've recently used it to create a set of part images (as I used to use ldglite) for the entire library, and they are FAN-TAB-u-Glorious! Travis has been very helpful, and even (...) (18 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: colors completeness
|
|
(...) Well the problem with bleys is that L3P doesn't just replace them, it deletes them. Fortunately it doesn't seem to have this problem with parts in colours greater than or equal to 256. Fortunately, l3p colour definitions check to make sure the (...) (18 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: colors completeness
|
|
(...) Neat. Can you explain what you mean by povray include file? A separate file from the model generated by L3P, that contains color definitions? How do you prevent L3P from replacing your custom colors with the default gray, as it does with other (...) (18 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: colors completeness
|
|
(...) Actually, in conjunction with Bricksmith's "Export Steps" option, LDView could be used to render each step (since each step is exported as a separate file). As recently discussed here, it is possible to run the current version of LDView on (...) (18 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!
|
|
(...) Absolutely. Before I started using LDView and realized that Bricksmith could also use its Unofficial folder, any and all unofficial files I downloaded just got dumped in parts. To chime in on the filename length issue, my LDraw folder got real (...) (18 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: colors completeness
|
|
(...) I find it easier just to use a different colour for bleys so I can set it up properly in a povray include file. I always use 263 for dark bley but don't yet have a standard for light bley. Tim (18 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: colors completeness
|
|
(...) My apologies if true. I was going off Steve's assertion in the LUGNET posting I linked to -- I haven't used L3P myself (only LDView). -- joshua (18 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!
|
|
(...) As a user (and a programmer; though I've yet to do any work on LDView), I prefer the way Travis is doing things. Not that that makes it right; I'm just saying that you can't (and shouldn't) lump the users and the programmers into two competing (...) (18 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: colors completeness
|
|
(...) Correct. As I noted in my other reply, the only way I've been able to render those colors (and a few others) with L3P/POV-ray is to replace the color codes with their 0x02RRGGBB style equivalents, and that's not really the most desirable (...) (18 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: colors completeness
|
|
--snip-- (...) L3p doesn't support it as far as I can tell... in fact L3P refuses to give bley or dark bley any colour at all. --snip-- Tim (18 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: colors completeness
|
|
(...) Hi Lutz, most excellent to see some questions from you; it's been a long time since we've conversed. (...) The LDRAW "group" (if you will) has created a color standard in ldconfig.ldr, a text file describing common settings to be used by LDRAW (...) (18 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: colors completeness
|
|
(...) I think it would be nice if Bricksmith read the ldconfig.ldr file to load color definitions, or if it offered a pane in the preferences or color picker to define new colors. Best of all, if it had an interface like that to read and update (...) (18 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Need (working) program to generate instruction pictures
|
|
(...) yes, I just thought the export option of Bricksmith just would generate pictures, but ended up with single step LDRs. They are of use for rendering, indeed. makes still some work... (...) Yes, I have done as a bypass so far. (...) Ah, thanks. (...) (18 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Need (working) program to generate instruction pictures
|
|
(...) I'd like something like that too. Although I don't think there's currently anything that will make the whole instructions for you, Bricksmith's "Export Steps" option may be a useful start. It creates a separate LDraw file for each step in your (...) (18 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | colors completeness
|
|
Hi, I have some questions about all those colors. I am using BrickSmith on Mac, I do not know if MLCAD does offer more colors. Bricksmith is missing the newer transparent dark orange and medium blue colors and some rarely used solid ones as bluish (...) (18 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Need (working) program to generate instruction pictures
|
|
Hi, I need some programm to create bitmaps (or other file formats) stepwise instructions, just like the old Ldraw did in DOS. I tried ldglite, but it just shows a white window, even after loading a model. Do I need some addtional software? I am (...) (18 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: Testing long filenames was Re: Unofficial directory (with non-standard name lenght)?
|
|
(...) showing D:DownloadsShowParameters.exe The second line (Label2) however, stays blank. With friendly greetings, M. Moolhuysen. (18 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | I hereby accect long file names!
|
|
(...) It's an utterly complicated way, but it works! Only problem is that GetLongPathName erases all other kinds of command line parameters. Now that I know that at least it is possible to avoid shortened pathnames, I rest my case. I no longer (...) (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!
|
|
(...) Indeed. (...) Well that's the part I disagree with. Everyone is different, and making assumptions about what people will want to use is always bad for program developers. The choice should be the user's, not the programmer's. (...) That may be (...) (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!
|
|
Before I say anything else, I want to point out that as the author of LDView my comments here are necessarily biased. So keep that in mind as you read them. (...) I disagree that it's not useful to have the unofficial parts in another directory. (...) (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Testing long filenames was Re: Unofficial directory (with non-standard name lenght)?
|
|
(...) (URL) on Win2000 SP4 w. (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Testing long filenames was Re: Unofficial directory (with non-standard name lenght)?
|
|
(...) My best guess is at that time MS was trying to make things safe for old programs (although it seems senseless for them to have done this with Win32 apps). If you call the Win32 function GetLongPathName on the short path, it will give you the (...) (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Testing long filenames was Re: Unofficial directory (with non-standard name lenght)?
|
|
(...) That was command line, (URL) the result with drag n drop> is similar. ROSCO (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for votes in LDraw polls
|
|
(...) No. Submissions must be made before the contest. So voting on the 1st and 31st will be the same. Tim (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for votes in LDraw polls
|
|
Is it possible to submit to the sotm/motm contests when voting starts? I am always afraid to vote because there might be a better submission later on. James (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for votes in LDraw polls
|
|
(...) Hi Mike, Unfortunately with the system used by LDraw it is very hard for the webmasters (Willy, Orion and I) to do anything much like that so the answer is probably no I'm afraid. Of course it does have a de facto check... if you click to a (...) (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for votes in LDraw polls
|
|
Tim Gould schrieb: (...) Hi Tim, I like the new -centered- position for all polls very, very much. But I have one question, is it possible to set a cookie on the client that would be read from the side, so I can see for which poll I have already (...) (18 years ago, 1-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: txt2dat on Mac OS X (was Re: Announcing Bitsticker)
|
|
(...) Here is my rudimentary makefile for building txt2dat on my Mac and a linux machine. No guarantees it will work for anyone else but hopefully it could be helpful. Also a copy of txt2dat.c containing my quick checks to get around the lack of (...) (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: txt2dat on Mac OS X (was Re: Announcing Bitsticker)
|
|
(...) I believe it is freetype 2.1.4 (based on the major/minor/patch definitions in freetype.h). The headers are last dated 2002, and a look at more recent freetype changelogs suggests that predates the introduction of "FTOrientation." It's annoying (...) (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial directory (with non-standard name lenght)? (Was: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!)
|
|
(...) Yeah I know they can be included but it's usually a safe idea not to. When setting a standard I'd be wary of allowing anything that is commonly poorly interpreted (which I suspect the escaped characters are). Tim (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Testing long filenames was Re: Unofficial directory (with non-standard name lenght)?
|
|
(...) Thanks, Well well, first advantage of downgrading to XP, I guess. Just to be sure, you did drag and drop into the "application", or did you write it in a command line? /Tore (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: txt2dat on Mac OS X (was Re: Announcing Bitsticker)
|
|
(...) Hmmm, interesting. txt2dat is currently compiled against 2.1.9, I haven't tried upgrading since txt2dat is the only thing I use it for. But the API doc at the freetype site still documents (URL) FTOrientation API>. Also, version 2.3.1 (which I (...) (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | txt2dat on Mac OS X (was Re: Announcing Bitsticker)
|
|
(...) Hi Ross, It works! I just built it by hand, so I'll write a simple makefile for it tomorrow. Only issue is that the version of Freetype 2 that comes with OS X doesn't seem to know about FTOrientation, so I just ifdeffed out the few bits that (...) (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Mac MPD Utility obsolescence
|
|
Man, I just realized that my old (URL) MPD Utility> is still listed on LDraw.org. Frankly, I don't think there's still a need for it, and I wouldn't really trust it to "do the right thing" with any given MPD. It was sort of cobbled together as a (...) (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Testing long filenames was Re: Unofficial directory (with non-standard name lenght)?
|
|
(...) (URL) Here's> the output on XP. ROSCO (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Testing long filenames was Re: Unofficial directory (with non-standard name lenght)?
|
|
(...) Well, I made a small program in Delphi 7 that lists the command line parameters, drag and dropped a file named "LongFileName.dat" in it, and here is the surprising result: (URL) (Running on a Win98SE PC.) So I think long file names still has (...) (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing Bitsticker (and other txt/bit-to-dat utilities)
|
|
(...) Hey, that'd be great! The makefile is a bit of a rat's nest, because I borrowed it from the freetype library, and modified it. The main reason I did that was for cross-platform compatability, but I've never had a Mac to try on. If you can get (...) (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing Bitsticker (and other txt/bit-to-dat utilities)
|
|
(...) Hey, txt2dat is cool! It looks like it should build on the Mac, too, so I'm puttering with rewriting the Makefile to make that happen. (The triangle library builds fine with the -DLINUX switch turned off.) It's part of my new crusade to get (...) (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!
|
|
(...) Sure, but as I said, you can't be 100% certain that the contents of the standard LDraw directory are all official and vice versa, so the best way to manage them (in my opinion) is lump them all together, and have a program that helps you (...) (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial directory (with non-standard name lenght)? (Was: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!)
|
|
(...) The only character either Linux or Mac OS X is allergic to is '/'. Spaces are perfectly acceptable under both. One need only take care that any paths fed to the shell are properly escaped. Ideally anybody writing shell scripts or system() (...) (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!
|
|
It's me the user that wants to know which unofficial parts I've downloaded and am using, and thus which may require updating, deleting, or something. For me it is purely a user-management issue. My program doesn't really care if a part is Official (...) (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial directory (with non-standard name lenght)? (Was: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!)
|
|
(...) With tongue slightly in cheek, I believe it is time to accept the technological advancements of 1984. If DOS wasn't obsolete the day it was written, it definitely was within a few years. DOS filenames tend to be inscrutable, and there just (...) (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing Bitsticker
|
|
(...) Another excellent idea. You'll have the option to use the paper color for transparent pixels, and then you can set the paper color to anything you want (including 16). I'm tempted to throw it in right now, but I've actually just started (...) (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing Bitsticker
|
|
(...) Thanks for pointing this out, I just realised (URL) txt2dat> does not include any header at all. I'd better fix that :) ROSCO (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing Bitsticker
|
|
You might consider adding an option to use color 16 (or perhaps the "paper" color) for fully transparent pixels in uploaded PNG files. --Travis (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing Bitsticker
|
|
(...) No sooner said than done! Thank you for the suggestion. I figured it would be good to wind the polygons consistently but I didn't think to declare it with BFC. Doing so is clearly beneficial. Jim (18 years ago, 2-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing Bitsticker
|
|
You might want to add the following two lines to the tops of your generated files: 0 UNOFFICIAL PART 0 BFC CERTIFY CW Adding the above two lines will enable BFC processing. The first line is needed because most models don't contain a 0 BFC CERTIFY (...) (18 years ago, 1-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!
|
|
(...) Well the other thing to consider is that with the adoption of the standard header on DAT files, there really is no *need* to store unofficial files in a different sub-directory, because programs will be able to tell which files are unofficial (...) (18 years ago, 1-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView 3.2 on Mac OS X with Qt 3.3.7 status report
|
|
I've tried a little (without success) to get QT4 to build as a universal static library. If I get that working, I'll see if I can't work out the QT4-specific bugs. While the border and extra space on top aren't good in the QT4 version, the overall (...) (18 years ago, 1-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial directory (with non-standard name lenght)? (Was: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!)
|
|
(...) First of all, I agree that we should avoid using space in filenames for all official stuff. It's just too problematic. However, that's not a reason to forbid the use of long filenames in general. The thing is, any program that doesn't support (...) (18 years ago, 1-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Request for votes in LDraw polls
|
|
Hi all, As some of you know (and perhaps some do not) LDraw conducts various polls, both for official reasons (such as elections and Constitutional changes) and for contests (such as model of the month, part of the month etc.). Unfortunately the (...) (18 years ago, 1-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.announce) !
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing Bitsticker
|
|
(...) That is pretty clever, by the way. It reminds me of grayscale on graphing calculators (like (URL) or (URL) this>). That gives me a silly idea. LDraw on a TI-92. (...) Cool! That is a great application for it. Let me know how it goes. Jim (18 years ago, 1-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing Bitsticker
|
|
(...) That is very cool. I'm even going to spotlight it to get it above my post about getting pretty things on the NXT... ;-) Actually, if I upload the graphics I used on the NXT to your script I can make them appear on the display screen of Philo's (...) (18 years ago, 1-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Testing long filenames was Re: Unofficial directory (with non-standard name lenght)?
|
|
(...) And sorry to reply to myself... Could people using older operating systems test this? I'm happy to maintain the status quo if there are problems but if no-one finds problems then I think we make the majority suffer for something that isn't (...) (18 years ago, 1-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial directory (with non-standard name lenght)? (Was: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!)
|
|
(...) I'm not sure about 98 and its ilk but I've never had any problems with long filenames in XP for l3p (and possible other command lines although I can't remember any off hand). I would certainly recommend against using spaces in filenames as (...) (18 years ago, 1-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView 3.2 on Mac OS X with Qt 3.3.7 status report
|
|
(...) I think I forgot to mention that using Qt 3 also restored "polling" mode, which broke with Qt 4. Jim (18 years ago, 1-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial directory (with non-standard name lenght)? (Was: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!)
|
|
(...) It it really so? We still use renderers and utilities that have command line inputs, and I don't know but I have a strong feeling that long names may cause problems like "Unofficial" turs into "Unoffi~1" followed by path not found errors. And (...) (18 years ago, 1-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Motion to the LDraw Bylaws (Accountability of "Key Positions"): Call for Ratification
|
|
Since the motion to the LDraw Bylaws has been posted (URL) and publicly discussed, and since by peoples' silence, there appear to be no more lingering objections, the Steering Committee hereby calls for a community vote to ratify the motion which (...) (18 years ago, 1-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | 2007/2008 LDraw Steering Committee Election is open
|
|
The 2006 LDraw.org Steering Committee election is now open. To vote, please visit (URL) and log in with your user account. Next, visit the ballot page on LDraw.org here: (URL) LDraw organization members may vote and you may vote for up to five (...) (18 years ago, 1-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | LDraw.org's February 2007 Model and Scene of the Month Winners
|
|
Congratulations to the winners of the February 2007 Model/Scene Of The Month (MOTM/SOTM) contests: (URL) MOTM, Yellow Sportspeeder by Joseph Durel> (URL) SOTM, The Forces of Isengard by Philip Heinrich> The voting for the March 2007 Model of the (...) (18 years ago, 1-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.announce, FTX)
|
| |
| | LDView 3.2 on Mac OS X with Qt 3.3.7 status report
|
|
Just an update on my LDView tinkering. I got Qt 3.3.7 compiled and used it to rebuild the current LDView 3.2 code. As predicted in the other LDView thread, using Qt 3.3.7 instead of Qt 4.2.2 resolved some of the issues I'd observed, most notably the (...) (18 years ago, 1-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Announcing Bitsticker
|
|
I'd like to announce the availability of a little script I wrote that converts small bitmap images (JPG, PNG, GIF) to "stickers" that you can use in your LDraw models. The script is called Bitsticker and there's nothing to download: just visit (URL) (...) (18 years ago, 1-Mar-07, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Nominations Closed was Call for Nominations: 2007 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Willy Tschager wrote: --snip-- (...) Hi all, The nomination process is now closed. Thanks to everyone involved. We will announce the voting elsewhere. Tim (18 years ago, 28-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial directory (with non-standard name lenght)? (Was: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!)
|
|
--snip-- (...) Personally I'm against maintaining it. It forces us into strange naming conventions for something which probably affects no users of the software. Tim (18 years ago, 28-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Unofficial directory (with non-standard name lenght)? (Was: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!)
|
|
(...) So far, we have maintained the old DOS convention of max. 8 chars and no SPACE used in folder names. I realize that fewer and fewer programs and utils are made in DOS evironments, maybe I'm the only to still make quick 'n' dirty programs in (...) (18 years ago, 28-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Reminder: 2007 Steering Committee Nominations closing in 24 hours
|
|
(...) And once more for 24 hours from now. Tim (18 years ago, 27-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
Willy Tschager schrieb: (...) I Michael Heidemann accept the nomination. mikeheide (18 years ago, 27-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Bricksmith tips and techniques
|
|
(...) I hope you are not alarmed that someone has been snooping around in there! :) In fact, I hadn't actually tried to commit anything; frankly, I'd just left that as an exercise for anyone else who thought the colorized icons were handy (which (...) (18 years ago, 27-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Bricksmith tips and techniques
|
|
(...) Thanks. I love to have happy users! (...) Good gosh, someone is even digging through my CVS repository! The reason you're not able to commit anything, incidentally, is because you are not listed as a Developer on my project. Anyway, if you (...) (18 years ago, 27-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!
|
|
I'm delighted to see another developer supporting the Macintosh. (...) Yeah, LDraw/Unofficial just seemed like the logical choice. That was feature that went nowhere, though. I never even documented it, because I didn't think anyone else supported (...) (18 years ago, 27-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | "UCS" LEGO Factory MOC: GP-38
|
|
I present my first venture into the world of 10-wide LEGO Factory train creations, a GP-38 locomotive in CSX-like colors. (URL) > A while back, there was some discussion about UCS train models, so I created this as a response. It can be used as a (...) (18 years ago, 27-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.cad.ldd, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) I, Willy Tschager, second this nomination. w. (18 years ago, 27-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) My thanks to the nominators for the vote of confidence, but my life will be busier than normal over the next 6 months that I, Kevin Clague, am going to decline the nomination. Kevin (18 years ago, 26-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
I, Tim Gould, nominate Michael Heidemann (18 years ago, 26-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) I, Tim Gould, second this nomination (18 years ago, 26-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
I, Michael Heidemann, nominate Guy Vivan. mikeheide (18 years ago, 26-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Hook Coupling 737c01.dat and 444.dat train wheel.
|
|
Reinhard "Ben" Beneke schrieb: (...) I just found on Peeron the following part: x468cx1 Electric 4.5V Battery Box 6 x 11 x 3 & 1/3 with Red Dot and Single Plugs In the instruction it seems to be the same as x468cx4 Electric 4.5V Battery Box 6 x 11 x (...) (18 years ago, 26-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
