CAD Development : 10554


CAD / Development / 10554	10553 \| 10555

Subject:	Re: Unofficial directory (with non-standard name lenght)? (Was: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad.dev
Date:	Fri, 2 Mar 2007 01:36:13 GMT
Viewed:	3936 times

In lugnet.cad.dev.mac, Tore Eriksson wrote:

My question is: Do we still maintain the DOS naming convention in LDraw?

With tongue slightly in cheek, I believe it is time to accept the technological advancements of 1984. If DOS wasn’t obsolete the day it was written, it definitely was within a few years. DOS filenames tend to be inscrutable, and there just isn’t any reason to force them on unsuspecting 21st-century users—especially those using systems which never had such limitations in the first place. And as others mentioned, programs which still talk DOS are dead codebases anyway.

Allen

Message is in Reply To:

		Unofficial directory (with non-standard name lenght)? (Was: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!)
(...) So far, we have maintained the old DOS convention of max. 8 chars and no SPACE used in folder names. I realize that fewer and fewer programs and utils are made in DOS evironments, maybe I'm the only to still make quick 'n' dirty programs in (...) (17 years ago, 28-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)

39 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search