Subject:
|
Re: LDView error
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sun, 4 Mar 2007 00:52:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3303 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Jaco van der Molen wrote:
> My problem was solved by downloading a dll file nvoglnt.dll. It turned out
> my version was 0 kb !?
> The strange thing however is that LDView renders slower than my GF2 card???
I don't know off-hand the performance characteristics of those two cards, but if
your GF2 wasn't an MX, then it's actually possible that the new card is actually
slower at geometry processing (despite being two full generations newer). In
LDView, the geometry processing ability of the video card is the most important
thing. The MX cards from nVidia were always the less expensive
consumer-oriented cards (vs the hard-core gamer cards), and so the GF 4 MX440
may have less geometry ability than a standard GF2.
In any event, I'd suggest downloading the latest full driver package from nVidia
and seeing how things go with that installed. They've generally been good about
having their latest drivers support cards all the way back to Riva TNT.
--Travis
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LDView error
|
| "Travis Cobbs" <tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com> schreef in bericht news:JECt3F.ED0@lugnet.com... (...) Which is indeed true. The GF2 was not MX. (...) This is dissappointing... I assumed a GF4 would be better on all fronts than an GF2. (...) Thanks (...) (18 years ago, 4-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LDView error
|
| My problem was solved by downloading a dll file nvoglnt.dll. It turned out my version was 0 kb !? The strange thing however is that LDView renders slower than my GF2 card??? "Jaco van der Molen" <jmolen@zonnet.nl> schreef in bericht (...) (18 years ago, 3-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
