 | | Re: New non-magnetic coupler design
|
|
(...) I love your truck design. I might suggest using an axle piece 1 size shorter than what is in your display, (a "2" instead of a "3", or similar) but otherwise I have no complaint. As for your other problem, I think it is the downside of running (...) (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Modeled Tanks
|
|
I've posted some pics of Mechanzied Bricks German and Russian Tanks. (URL) (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: June 2001 MOTM contest
|
|
(...) Well, if these two are created, I probably wouldn't be voting in the model-only contest. It sounds too much like work <G>. I vote for MOTM because there's nice eye-candy and it's fun. The model-only contest implies that I have to scrutinize (...) (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back... (Clarified! )
|
|
(...) It does go rather far back, doesn't it??? That's before I ever even heard of Lugnet! (...) Yeah, that's exactly why I can't figure out what to make of all this, and why I generally don't directly participate in debates. Not because I don't (...) (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: June 2001 MOTM contest
|
|
When I vote for MOTM, I consider both the rendering and the model. However, if there are enough POV gurus out there that can submit fairly good models with superb scenes, they could possibly take all votes away from people who make incredible models (...) (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: June 2001 MOTM contest
|
|
"Terry K" <legoverse@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:GE0K6s.Ew@lugnet.com... (...) For an LDraw.org run contest, I would restrict entries to models which have been generated with DAT utilities. (...) I wouldn't restrict model entries to bare (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: June 2001 MOTM contest
|
|
(...) But what would be an allowable entry in 'LDRAWn'? A bmp. output of the actual original LDraw? Or include outputs or screenshots of LDLite, MLCad, LDView, BlockCAD, and others? Perhaps restrict model entries to a basic rendered output available (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: June 2001 MOTM contest
|
|
"Terry K" <legoverse@yahoo.com> skrev i meddelandet news:GDyo23.666@lugnet.com... (...) rendered. I mean, there are many modelers that maybe haven't mastered POVRay (or other renderers) yet, but might still have good models. MOTM is more and more (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: *.lca to *.dat?
|
|
"Tore Eriksson" <tore.eriksson@mbox3...wipnet.se> skrev i meddelandet news:3B109B1F.725658...pnet.se... (...) How far did you get? Anything to share, I might give it a shot - it's just the kind of challenge I like (Yes, there are weird people in the (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: *.lca to *.dat?
|
|
I tried to analyze a .lca on its binary stuff, but I gave up. It's just too complicted, and possibly compressed. It could work if TLC handed us the specifications for the file format, but why should they do that? LEGO Creator is, after all, a (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | *.lca to *.dat?
|
|
Hi. Is there any way to turn LEGO Creator files (.lca) into .dat files or vise-versa? If so, i might try to import the battle driod into the program and see if lets me, but i have no way to convert the files. (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | June 2001 MOTM contest
|
|
That time again, A very interesting mix of entries. Vote now through the end of the month... (URL) Terry K -- (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) !
|
| |
| | Re: Me again
|
|
2. Yes, I downloaded it and it looks promising. (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?)
|
|
I agree with Jon Palmer. Since he failed to put the desired newsgroup in FUT section, I've taken the liberty of doing it for him. This should apply to all discussions caused by soc's original post that obviously have gone off-topic. Travis Dickinson (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: Me again
|
|
(...) Hmm... What is Opera 5.11? I use IE 5.5 so I guess I'm out of luck there, anyway. (...) I've tried several times, but it won't download for me. Is this also an IE 5.5 issue perhaps? Still interested in your movie, Dirtman (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Me again
|
|
I just wanted to check opera 5.11 on lugnet and tell two things. 1 Opera works well in lugnet GREAT for me bad for IE 5.5 ! 2 Has anyone else downloaded my animation? Eduardo (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?)
|
|
(...) <this is the REAL SOC speaking> YES!! By all means yes!! But one question - and this goes out to everybody that has asked this question... If you want it out of a group, FIX THE FOLLOW UP!!! You failed to do this, as well has most of the (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?)
|
|
(...) Finally! The voice of reason! Thank you, Paul, for saying what many of us are thinking! Some additional comments, though: If someone gets their feelings hurt on lugnet, why must they subject ALL of us to their anger? I know when <I> read (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?)
|
|
Guys is it possible we could keep this discussion in off-topic.debate? -Jon "soc" <reallysick_of_crap@...tmail.com> wrote in message news:GDx9Jo.IDB@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) posts, (...) each (...) clarify? (...) about (...) proxy (...) I'll (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?)
|
|
Ok, it's time for me to step in... who am I? just a father who has heard a few to many unnecessary words. It takes at least two people to argue. If no one else will reply to this type of postings, they will quit. If someone wants to flame someone, (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?)
|
|
(...) Desperation?! Ok for the English impaired: Even if your account is reinsated no one will forgive your transgressions. Bottom line is children are a large portion of Lugnet participants and common social decency is expected here. This is NOT a (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?)
|
|
(...) You don't get it do you. You have not only violated Lugnet's TOS but also US Fedral law. (regardless of the fact it is not enforceable.) But first and for most you have violated the basic decency and trust of the comunity. You can never join (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back... (Clarified! )
|
|
Thank you so much for providing such a thorough background. I had no idea that this thread had so much depth. Now I kinda feel sorry for this Mr. Moulton. The only reason why he insulted Judes web-page was because he was harboring feelings of (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?)
|
|
(...) ... (...) Well, to the best that I could follow, it goes roughly: Matthew Moulton made disparaging remarks about someone's teaser (URL) got offended, points were made, things were said, basically a flame war erupted. What the arguments (that (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?)
|
|
Man this thread is hard to follow!!! (And I tried to go through all the 76+ stuff.) With all the canceled posts and the alleged ‘double-speak.’ I believe I've got all the players involved… but could someone please summaries what’s going on. I think (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: printable parts catalog
|
|
(...) has gone into it. Thanx! :] KDJ ___...___ LUGNETer #203, Windsor, Ontario, Canada (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: .dat to .3ds or .obj
|
|
Well there's MAX2DAT here: (URL) it out. -Orion (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Alternative possible hi-res sphere primitive
|
|
(...) Hey, Travis Your hi-res sphere looks great! Much better than the other one available (Sorry, Steve, but it does look smoother and more even). I've begun to model my own Parts and Primitives library in MLCad. I've run into a wall with modelling (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: printable parts catalog
|
|
(...) One question, Why are some of the images .jpg and others .png? Could this cause problems with some browsers? -Chuck Sommerville (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back...
|
|
(...) Not to worry. Most LUGNETters can tell the difference. It's just unfortunate that your name was chosen. -Duane (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | 7127 AT-ST
|
|
Hi all, Currently I am modelling the AT-ST (set 7127) and put up a picture at: (URL) I am looking for is the part that connects the foot to the lower leg. It is light gray and connects to the teeth parts. I have created some parts that are in this (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Test posting of "Unoffficial Update"
|
|
I just noticed #30414 (Brick 1x4 with studs on side) is named "_3010-8.dat" in this unofficial update. Clearly the partnumber is 30414. Greetingz... Sjaacko (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | [swh5.dat] ~Subpart Five - Hinge Brick 1 x 2 Locking without back [DAT]
|
|
0 ~Subpart Five - Hinge Brick 1 x 2 Locking without back 0 Name: swh5.dat 0 Author: Jaco van der Molen 0 Made from swh3 by John VanZwieten 0 1 16 -30 -5 0 1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 1 stud3.dat 2 24 -14 -5 6 -46 -5 6 2 24 -46 -5 -6 -14 -5 -6 2 24 -14 -5 -6 (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | #30388 Hinge Brick 1 x 6 Locking with Fingers On Each End [DAT]
|
|
0 Hinge Brick 1 x 6 Locking with Fingers On Each End 0 Name: 30388.dat 0 Author: Jaco van der Molen 0 Created from various parts by John VanZwieten 0 1 16 70 9 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 swh5.DAT 1 16 -70 9 0 -1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -1 swh5.DAT 0 4 16 24 4 -6 -24 (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back...
|
|
I have a question, Who in the hell is this guy? Is this the mathew formerly known as 'mad Hatter' ?? because if he is I can understand the hatred and anger. But if its someone else thats pissed everybody off, could you point me to some posts or (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | #894s01 (?) ~Subpart Roadsign Clip-on 2 x 2 Square [DAT]
|
|
0 ~Subpart Roadsign Clip-on 2 x 2 Square 0 Name: 894s01.dat 0 Author: Jaco van der Molen 0 Modified from 890s01 by John VanZwieten 0 1 16 0 0 -6 1 0 0 0 0 -4 0 2 0 box5.dat 2 24 4 -4 1 4 4 1 2 24 7 4 1 7 -4 1 2 24 7 -4 -6 4 -4 -6 2 24 4 -4 -6 4 4 -6 (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | # 894 (?) Roadsign Clip-on 2 x 2 Square [DAT]
|
|
0 Roadsign Clip-on 2 x 2 Square 0 Name: 894.dat (?) 0 Author: Jaco van der Molen 0 Made up from 890 by John VanZwieten 0 Front Face 4 16 -20 -20 -10 -20 20 -10 20 20 -10 20 -20 -10 0 Rest of Part 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 894s01.dat 0 (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Correct 892s01.dat [DAT]
|
|
0 ~Subpart Roadsign Clip-on 2.2 X 2 2/3 Triangular 0 Name: 892s01.dat 0 Author: John VanZwieten 0 Modified by: Jaco van der Molen 0 Official LCad update 99-06 0 1 16 0 0 -6 1 0 0 0 0 -4 0 2 0 box5.dat 0 2 24 4 -4 1 4 4 1 2 24 7 4 1 7 -4 1 2 24 7 -4 (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Correct 890s01.dat [DAT]
|
|
0 ~Subpart Roadsign Clip-on 2 X 2 Octagonal 0 Name: 890s01.dat 0 Author: John VanZwieten 0 Modified by: Jaco van der Molen 0 Official LCad update 99-03 0 1 16 20 0 -7.50 0 -1 0 0 0 -8 1.50 0 0 rect.dat 1 16 -20 0 -7.50 0 -1 0 0 0 -8 1.50 0 0 (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 890, 892 and 894 (?)
|
|
Hi all, While making the "Roadsign Clip-on 2 X 2 Square", as seen in the AT-ST, I just used the 890 (and 892) by John VanZwieten and discovered 2 gaps in the clips in suppart models 890s01 and 892s01. They are in lines: - 52 and 84 in 890s01 - 31 (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back...
|
|
(...) Jaco, See: (URL) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back...
|
|
Hey, I did not write this! I did not sent a reply to these messages! (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back...
|
|
(...) And now for something completely different, www.bardstale.com Perhaps people will take note that there are OTHER THINGS in the internet to occupy our time, rather than Matthew's flames n' stuff. I say we MOVE ON. -Aaron- (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back...
|
|
(...) Like I said in my other post. Its not what you've linked to, its the way you've linked. Being cynical about a memorial that respects a member of this community who has done so much for others, indicates more about YOU than anything you have to (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back...
|
|
James Jessiman was an AFOL who worked on a program for drawing lego pieces etc..and to make instructions out of them. The result of his work is found at (URL) , a commonly used program for rendering lego creations. Sadly, James died a few years ago (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back...
|
|
What did this guy do wrong? I think i missed somthing. Can someone please enlighten me? not so I can rat on him more i just wanna know who this guy is and what he did that ticked so many of you off. Links to previous posts maybe? with so many people (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back...
|
|
It's the way you've linked the site that is getting on peoples noses. Not eveyrone is quite the ironic sarcastic humourist you've clearly made yourself out to be. You are not amsuing me...get over it. Santosh PS. are you one of those smart arses who (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Five Level Custom Death Star
|
|
The .dat files for Robert Martin's immense Death Star (five levels with a working trash compactor and working turbolift) are now available for download at FBTB. (URL) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.cad, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back...
|
|
(...) Probably doing the same thing I did: clicking on the face you want to stop the cube, then it just sits there. Single clicking does nothing; you have to double click (Did I miss somewhere were it says to double-click? Not the best UI (esp the (...) (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back...
|
|
(...) What's funny, is that the particular place it's linking to is what's trivializing the tragic death, not anything I've done. (...) I have a grip, quite a firm one. The stance I took on my site is fairly non emotional. Sort of like, "I said (...) (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back...
|
|
Hey, Simon Bateman... I'm the last person I would normally expect to dole out a lecture, but regardless of how you think the Lugnet community should or shouldn't be remembering James Jessiman, the link on the bottom of your page is downright (...) (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back...
|
|
(...) Try single clicking first to enlarge the cube side you want, then double click. I may try to tweak the mouse sensitivity and see if I can't make it work a bit better. Do you think it might be better if I just made it a single click instead of (...) (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back...
|
|
(...) It should work fine with IE, I never actually tested the site with Netscape personally, glad to know it works though. Did all the spacing look alright with Netscape? (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: Is there any benefit...
|
|
(...) Yeah, I wasn't thinking of a large-scale rewrite, but I was curious. (...) I'm not at all code-savvy, but I'd help where possible. Dave! (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Is there any benefit...
|
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> To: <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 10:54 AM Subject: Re: Is there any benefit... (...) most (...) recursing (...) But (...) It's not worth the trouble: (...) (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Is there any benefit...
|
|
(...) The main advantage would be saving a few bytes of file space. Which is most significant to the download process, since we've got about 3MB of data, between ldraw.exe and complete.exe. The rendering time would be *mostly* unaffected. On the on (...) (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | set 1818 CORRECTED still [incomplete] no minifig [DAT]
|
|
Ok, here is an MPD of the set i posted earlier. My first DAT had no wings! (thanks Tore) So it looks like I had to do an MPD file. Here it is. I went ahead and added the rest of the set. however it is still incomplete because the small car is (...) (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets)
|
| |
| | Re: set 1818 [incomplete]
|
|
(...) oops my bad. I made the wings separately and just added them to my dat file. I guess I can't do that? I suppose I need a mpd file? I dunno, I'm kinda new to this Alex (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back...
|
|
(...) Ah... seems to be an Internet Exploder thing. It works in Netscape. :^P ~Grand Admiral Muffin Head (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back...
|
|
(...) Worked for me, I was able to navigate to various places. PC/mac thing maybe? (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back...
|
|
(...) Oh, I got it to work. It's extremely difficult to catch the cube face you want and double click it though. Some nice LCAD models hidden in there. Ignored the rude looking inks at the bottom. Oh yeah, and the page crashed my browser. Oh, and (...) (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back...
|
|
(...) And bashing the LUGNET community, I see. I hope that you can abide by the TOS like the rest of us this time. -Duane (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back...
|
|
(...) Uhhhh... I don't get it. I'm clicking, but nothing's happening. ~Grand Admiral Muffin Head (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: set 1818 [incomplete]
|
|
Where are the wings? It wasn't suppoesed to be this incomplete, was it? :o) /Tore (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets)
|
| |
| | I'm back...
|
|
(URL) he, he...back and better than ever. `, ) (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: Arctic wall .dat file. Does it exist anywhere?
|
|
"Trevor Pruden" <trevor_pruden@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GDtKKF.5yz@lugnet.com... (...) use (...) I don't know about the part, but MLCad supports both .dat and .mpd files. Dan (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | .dat to .3ds or .obj
|
|
Has anyone stumbled across a program (or Max script) to convert DAT files to 3DS or OBJ? There's no hassle converting to DXF first and importing them, just time consuming, and the meshes don't always end up how I envisage them. ie - The normals get (...) (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Arctic wall .dat file. Does it exist anywhere?
|
|
Hi Everyone, This is my first time posting to these groups, but I am searching for a MLCAD part file for the arctic style walls that have the window in them. They come in blue and light grey in the arctic sets, and I would like to use them in my (...) (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | set 1818 [incomplete] [DAT]
|
|
No minifigs and the rest of the models in the set are on hiatus and are not posted. I can't seem to find the paddles that go on the back of the car. 0 Airplane from set 1818 0 Name: 1818d.dat 0 Author: Alex Lau 0 Official Model [incomplete] 0 COLOR (...) (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets)
|
| |
| | Re: My mail is temporarily down
|
|
At last, my mail works again! /Tore (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Another animation from me Eduardo
|
|
(...) Great at last someone has download it I will make the same with my town, castle pirates models. (...) It is 160 x 120 pixels the Finished version wil be at 320 x 200 with q2 with studs may be with bumps if someone has an idea tell me it. (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | printable parts catalog
|
|
Well, I've done it. All the part numbers are now in the images themselves. No more formatting problems! Anyway, here it is: (URL) Patrick Sayre-Little sayrew@pr.erau.edu (URL) (23 years ago, 23-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Another animation from me Eduardo
|
|
(...) The download worked for me. There are three zip-downloads. Each of them contains one rar subfile, except the first, which contains two. Once all the three are unzipped, you must unrar the four part archive, which leaves you with a 4,5MB (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Is there any benefit...
|
|
I've noticed that a number of older DAT files could be steamlined (that is, rendered using far fewer lines) by application of box.dat and rect.dat primitives rather than a series of linetypes 2 and 4. Is there any merit in doing this, such as (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Another animation from me Eduardo
|
|
(...) Hey, Eduardo! This sounds really cool, and I'm anxious to see it. Unfortunately, none of the download links worked for me. Please check them out and tell me if I'm doing something wrong. Please respond, I really want to see your cool 3-part (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | ldglite 0.9.0 (now includes LEdit emulation mode)
|
|
LdGLite version 0.9.0 in now available. It now includes an LEdit emulation mode for those times when you just can't resist moving some pieces around in a model. There's no PARTS.LST lookup yet. I just use the printable parts catalog to find the part (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LGEO and colours
|
|
"Lars C. Hassing" <lch@ccieurope.com> wrote in message news:GDrCFM.L0w@lugnet.com... (...) Ah, I always thought that option was for if you were rendering files directly from the parts dir (where most colours were specifed as 16 and 24) so you could (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-01, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Panel 1 x 4 x 1 [DAT]
|
|
0 Panel 1 x 4 x 1 0 Name: 30413.dat 0 Author: Jaco van der Molen 1 16 20 20 0 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud3.dat 1 16 0 20 0 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud3.dat 1 16 -20 20 0 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud3.dat 1 16 0 24 0 36 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 6 box5.dat 4 16 40 24 10 36 (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: LGEO and colours
|
|
Austin Greenwood wrote... (...) Please be more specific. My L3P v1.3 20010120 renders color 57 Transparent Orange well. /Lars (23 years ago, 22-May-01, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | 1792 - Pleasure cruiser (no minifig) [DAT]
|
|
mlCAD newbie here (only used it for about 4 days.) Also LUGNET newbie. Anyways, here is 1792 the Pleasure Cruiser. I've also finished 6483 but I want to polish the DAT file a little before posting it, unlike this one. There is no minifig or step (...) (23 years ago, 22-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets)
|
| |
| | Re: LGEO and colours
|
|
Daniel Crichton wrote... (...) Ah, is it the "one part problem", see (2 URLs) ? L3P or POVRay has a problem with DAT files with only one part, that's why I added the -c option. Daniel Crichton wrote first in this thread... (...) Before my previous (...) (23 years ago, 22-May-01, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PAO and Windows 2000?
|
|
Yes. They are in fact, different sizes... very peculiar. I tested both and they both work fine. Thanks to you both. :-) Oh, and I don't have Visual Studio on my machine ( at least not to my knowledge). -Andy ----- Original Message ----- From: (...) (23 years ago, 22-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Another animation from me Eduardo
|
|
Well I being working for a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away ... on a MPG that shows nearly all my LEGO SPACE "Space the final frontier these are my Lego models ..." nearly all my models 14 of them. I know the MPG is now great because of its (...) (23 years ago, 22-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PAO and Windows 2000?
|
|
(...) Same date, different size? Interesting! Nope, no Visual Studio. It occurs in my registry but pointing to nonexistent directories. I know less about this machine than I'd like, as usual. Cheers, Heather -- Heather Patey Pirate Wench / Brick (...) (23 years ago, 22-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PAO and Windows 2000?
|
|
My version of COMDLG32.OCX is newer than yours (this may be your problem) My file info: Created: May 07, 1999 Size: 137KB (140,488 btyes) Also do you have Visual Studio on your PC? If so what version? Heather what version do you have? Ahui (23 years ago, 22-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PAO and Windows 2000?
|
|
Aha, that's it. Mine is 140,288 bytes, dated May 7/99. Interestingly, it has the same date as a couple other OCX's that have Microsoft tracks, dunno where from. You can run but you can't hide... Anyway, it's on the way to you via e-mail - let us (...) (23 years ago, 22-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Where to submit new parts
|
|
(...) Please email them to parts@ldraw.org. Steve (23 years ago, 22-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
