Subject:
|
Re: Is there any benefit...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 24 May 2001 17:54:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
339 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Dave Schuler writes:
> I've noticed that a number of older DAT files could be steamlined (that is,
> rendered using far fewer lines) by application of box.dat and rect.dat
> primitives rather than a series of linetypes 2 and 4. Is there any merit in
> doing this, such as quicker rendering time?
The main advantage would be saving a few bytes of file space. Which is most
significant to the download process, since we've got about 3MB of data,
between ldraw.exe and complete.exe.
The rendering time would be *mostly* unaffected. On the on hand, recursing
into another file takes some time, and that tends to slow things down. But
if the files are smaller, then the IO could speed up a little bit.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Is there any benefit...
|
| ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> To: <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 10:54 AM Subject: Re: Is there any benefit... (...) most (...) recursing (...) But (...) It's not worth the trouble: (...) (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Is there any benefit...
|
| I've noticed that a number of older DAT files could be steamlined (that is, rendered using far fewer lines) by application of box.dat and rect.dat primitives rather than a series of linetypes 2 and 4. Is there any merit in doing this, such as (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
