To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 1409
1408  |  1410
Subject: 
Re: June 2001 MOTM contest
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Sun, 27 May 2001 21:40:04 GMT
Viewed: 
560 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Anders Isaksson writes:
"Terry K" <legoverse@yahoo.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:GDyo23.666@lugnet.com...

http://www.ldraw.org/motm/

Hmm, does this selection show that it's time to have two classes: 'LDRAWn' and
rendered. I mean, there are many modelers that maybe haven't mastered POVRay
(or other renderers) yet, but might still have good models.

MOTM is more and more looking like a raytracing contest...

All IMO,
--
Anders Isaksson, Sweden
BlockCAD:  http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/proglego.htm
Gallery:   http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/gallery/index.htm

Interesting point, Anders.
But what would be an allowable entry in 'LDRAWn'?  A bmp. output of the
actual original LDraw?  Or include outputs or screenshots of LDLite, MLCad,
LDView, BlockCAD, and others?
Perhaps restrict model entries to a basic rendered output available through
using a tool such as L3P in default mode, with no supporting scene creation
allowed?  Thanks to Lars, that requires no mastering of POV-Ray.  It pretty
much is a no-brainer.

It's a fact that a quality render, with a scene supporting it, doubtlessly
affects the judgement of the voters.  Is that a good thing?  Or bad?  I
don't know.  I myself like a good model.  Having a good scene is nice, but I
still look at the model.  Others might not.  I am sure that many will vote
for the simple model with a clever supporting scene.  I have to admit it is
appealing.

And your right.  That does sorta make it look more like a raytracing contest.
To be honest, I like the idea of having a 'pure' model-oriented contest, one
where the merits of the only the model are used to pick the winner.
But on the other hand, I do like and appreciate a good scene.

But I also don't really want to have to manage two contests.  Sounds bad of
me, I know, but it's true.

What do others think?  Should we have two categories?
A "basic" category that features no supporting background or scene.
And a "scene" category for those wishing to put the effort into creating it.

Opinions?  Thoughts?

-- Terry K --



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: June 2001 MOTM contest
 
"Terry K" <legoverse@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:GE0K6s.Ew@lugnet.com... (...) For an LDraw.org run contest, I would restrict entries to models which have been generated with DAT utilities. (...) I wouldn't restrict model entries to bare (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
  Re: June 2001 MOTM contest
 
(...) Well, if these two are created, I probably wouldn't be voting in the model-only contest. It sounds too much like work <G>. I vote for MOTM because there's nice eye-candy and it's fun. The model-only contest implies that I have to scrutinize (...) (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: June 2001 MOTM contest
 
"Terry K" <legoverse@yahoo.com> skrev i meddelandet news:GDyo23.666@lugnet.com... (...) rendered. I mean, there are many modelers that maybe haven't mastered POVRay (or other renderers) yet, but might still have good models. MOTM is more and more (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

6 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR