Subject:
|
Re: Allow posting & FUT to member email
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Apr 2002 04:48:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1855 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, William R. Ward writes:
> William R Ward <bill@wards.net> writes:
> > "Ross Crawford" <rcrawford@csi.com> writes:
> > > In lugnet.admin.finance, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > > In lugnet.admin.finance, Ross Crawford writes:
> > > > > In lugnet.admin.finance, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > FUT /dev/null
> > > > >
> > > > > or lugnet.bit-bucket???? http://news.lugnet.com/admin/suggestions/?n=20
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Why not just allow FUT the posters own e-mail address?
> > >
> > > Maybe allow member.nnn in the posting / follow-up fields?
> > >
> > > Or even just a "to mail" checkbox for each?
> >
> > The standard NNTP behavior is to set "Followup-To: poster" in the
> > header.
> >
> > I'm doing that on this message, let's see if it works.
>
> Looks like it works just fine (I overrode the followup-to rule in
> order to post this message). If you try to reply to the above message
> in NNTP it sends e-mail. Does it do the same for web and SMTP users?
Yes, but it forces me to use NNTP if I want to override your FUT. That's not
acceptable for a user with no NNTP available.
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Allow posting & FUT to member email
|
| (...) Looks like it works just fine (I overrode the followup-to rule in order to post this message). If you try to reply to the above message in NNTP it sends e-mail. Does it do the same for web and SMTP users? If so, we've got our answer - put it (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
