Subject:
|
Re: Allow posting & FUT to member email
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Apr 2002 19:37:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2460 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Steve Bliss writes:
> In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Dan Boger writes:
>
> > hmmm... does that mean we should disallow FUT set to "lugnet.general,
> > poster", since the "poster" will be ignored?
>
> As an NNTP user, I'd say that poster should be allowed, since it seems to an
> NNTP-way of doing things.
I wasn't suggesting we disallow "poster" FUTs, just combinations "newsgroup,
poster" FUTs - are there any NNTP clients that support that kind of thing?
actually let you reply to the group and the email?
Dan
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Allow posting & FUT to member email
|
| (...) The problem with allowing FUT:poster (as pointed out before) is that web posters get no chance to override it when they reply. You could get around this by allowing "poster" in the "newsgroups" field too (probably only without any other NGs), (...) (22 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | Re: Allow posting & FUT to member email
|
| (...) Oh, ok. Sorry I didn't read carefully enough. (...) Forté Agent does -- when I went to reply to Ross' early message, I got a popup window, giving me the options of replying to the post by email, posting a reply to the newsgroup, or both. (...) (22 years ago, 10-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
Message is in Reply To:
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
