| |
"Ross Crawford" <rcrawford@csi.com> writes:
> In lugnet.admin.finance, Scott Arthur writes:
> > In lugnet.admin.finance, Ross Crawford writes:
> > > In lugnet.admin.finance, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > >
> > > > FUT /dev/null
> > >
> > > or lugnet.bit-bucket???? http://news.lugnet.com/admin/suggestions/?n=20
> >
> >
> > Why not just allow FUT the posters own e-mail address?
>
> Maybe allow member.nnn in the posting / follow-up fields?
>
> Or even just a "to mail" checkbox for each?
The standard NNTP behavior is to set "Followup-To: poster" in the
header.
I'm doing that on this message, let's see if it works.
--Bill.
--
William R Ward bill@wards.net http://www.wards.net/~bill/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Allow posting & FUT to member email
|
| (...) Looks like it works just fine (I overrode the followup-to rule in order to post this message). If you try to reply to the above message in NNTP it sends e-mail. Does it do the same for web and SMTP users? If so, we've got our answer - put it (...) (22 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
Message is in Reply To:
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
