Subject:
|
Re: Allow posting & FUT to member email
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Apr 2002 04:24:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2456 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, William R. Ward writes:
> In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > FUTs are, at the root, suggestions, not mandates. Proper ettiquette suggests
> > careful use of them, yes, but it is rude to prevent the responder from
> > setting FUT as he sees fit if he has good reason for doing so.
>
> I agree completely.
>
> But that's not the issue that started all this. The request was, as the
> subject says, to "allow posting & FUT to member email". This issue is solved
> by the use of "Followup-To: poster".
Well arguably it's not solved. No more or less than the problem of 2
termites in your house would be solved by blowing the entire house up,
anyway. (it's late, forgive my poor analogy, but the idea is that the fix
isn't a fix if it's worse than the problem)
But this being suggestions, I suggest we let it lie fallow for a while
rather than starting a new thread.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Allow posting & FUT to member email
|
| (...) I agree completely. But that's not the issue that started all this. The request was, as the subject says, to "allow posting & FUT to member email". This issue is solved by the use of "Followup-To: poster". However, a *new* issue has arisen as (...) (22 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
