Subject:
|
Re: Ideas ready to be shot down
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.finance
|
Date:
|
Mon, 8 Apr 2002 14:56:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2340 times
|
| |
|
|
Make that 4 attacks in three days... and I've probably read only a tiny
proportion of your posts. Have you really nothing better to do? I’m
certainly not going to waste time correcting the erroneous statements you
make below.
Scott A
=+=
Have you inspected Arthur’s Seat yet?
http://www.bricklink.com/store.asp?p=scotta
"A reasonable man adapts himself to suit his environment. An unreasonable
man persists in attempting to adapt his environment to suit himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man." (GBS)
=+=
In lugnet.admin.finance, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> I'm breaking my resolution here for good reason, I think.
>
> In lugnet.admin.finance, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > This would lead to a LUGNET with more posts by Cary Clark and Frank Filz and
> > > less by... well, by Scott Arthur for one! (and me for another, perhaps...)
> > > That's *got* to be a good thing.
> >
> > Larry,
> > The thread you posted in was created by me to help the LUGNET community in a
> > small way. Until your post I was very happy with the way it had grown.
>
> We differ there only in the impact of one post, it's a good thread. I
> seriously posted my suggestion in the spirit of the thread, as a thought
> starter. I doubt it would be implemented but think it may spur some positive
> thinking in the area. Even if unimplementable it's nevertheless a good idea.
>
> Think out of the box about the idea for a bit before you shoot it down as
> being a personal attack on you. Really, you flatter yourself. If you take
> the fact that I pointed out that under such a scheme you *and I* would
> likely be voted "people that have to pay more than average to post" as a
> personal insult, well, that's your issue, not mine. I'm not the only person
> who feels you are one of the more annoying posters here, and you are not the
> only person who feels that I am one of the more annoying posters here.
>
> I have nothing else to say to you despite your manifold distortions of me
> and what I have said at every opportunity, and certainly have no desire
> whatever to personally communicate with you. I will now try to return to my
> mostlhy kept resolution, which is, for the record (and despite your
> deliberate distortion and drive by mudsling recently), "don't respond
> directly to Scott's posts on LUGNET", NOT "don't post in .debate".
>
> FUT /dev/null
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Ideas ready to be shot down
|
| I'm breaking my resolution here for good reason, I think. (...) We differ there only in the impact of one post, it's a good thread. I seriously posted my suggestion in the spirit of the thread, as a thought starter. I doubt it would be implemented (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.finance)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
