To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 1689
1688  |  1690
Subject: 
Re: What little loc groups are best for
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Tue, 18 May 1999 00:14:01 GMT
Viewed: 
187 times
  
   http://www.lugnet.com/loc/uk/

That would help a fair bit. What would make the page even more useful
would be if the big space on the left was used to display a bit of text
explaining what the links are and what the structure of the groups is.

By "what the links are" do you mean what the links lead to, i.e. sub-
categories of the current category being viewed?

By "what the structure of the group is" do you mean the interrelation of the
group and its subgroups?

Yes and yes.

Also there's lots of numbers by the names at the top of the screen with
no explanation of what the numbers mean (or of what the links are links
to) [1]

Hmm, but what the numbers actually mean isn't as important as their relative
proportions, right?  Or does one still actually wonder what they mean?

But there's no text that even indicates the numbers are related to
the sizes of the discussion groups :)

That could very well be.  The itty bitty local groups are being used
correctly in the U.S. but people aren't using them correctly in the U.K. and
I don't understand why.  It's probably because there are still so few LEGO
fans online in the UK and they don't want to feel isolated in their own
empty local groups, so they post to the top-level UK group.  But they
problem is that in doing so, they're forgetting to cross-post to their
little local group, and this make the main group grow out of proportion to
the other groups.

Ah - but what is the correct way of using the groups? If most people in
a country are happy with how they are being used, doesn't that make it
the correct way of using them? :)

Simon
http://www.SimonRobinson.com



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: What little loc groups are best for
 
(...) OK. Using the groups "correctly" or "incorrectly" is not a good word-choice then. More accurately would be "using or not using the groups to their full advantage." --Todd (26 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: What little loc groups are best for
 
(...) Well, the main UK group doesn't actually cover the same areas as the smaller groups -- it does geographically, to some extent -- but not topically. That is to say, the smaller groups are for super-localised discussions (where something is so (...) (26 years ago, 17-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.general)

51 Messages in This Thread:





















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR