| |
On Thu, 13 May 1999 07:39:26 GMT, Todd Lehman uttered the following
profundities...
>
> Technically, you did break a rule of the LUGNET Terms of Use. But I think
> it's obvious to everyone here that you had no malicious intentions; your
> actions were with decent and innocent intentions.
Quite true. There was no malicious intent. But knee-jerk reactions, bad
results.
You did somewhere comment on how many posts. There was an attempt to do
it all at once, but it failed. It was only 10 or so, multiple cross-post.
One thing which made me feel really, really bad, was when someone mentioned
the possibility of e-mail subscription, and I felt an even bigger
idiot.
>
> We should talk (openly, here) about how to come up with a clean solution to
> the problem of people not finding the loc.uk group (if indeed that is the
> problem).
>
> --Todd
One group for each county, country, (count Channel Islands and IOM
as a country), and major city, such as Manchester, Edinburgh, etc.
2 for London, 1 north, 1 for south. (Thames as a natural barrier).
Any more localised groups can be quite easily covered by a
county group. This would reduce it from 83? to about 30 or so?
--
_____________________________________________________________
richard.dee@nospam.virgin.net remove nospam.(lugnet excepted)
Web Site: http://freespace.virgin.net/richard.dee/lego.html
ICQ 13177071 AOL Instant Messenger: RJD88888
_____________________________________________________________
For the best Lego news, visit: http://www.lugnet.com/news/
Need instructions for a model? http://www.kl.net/scans/
_____________________________________________________________
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: All UK Groups subscribed?
|
| (...) Ah! That would explain why I only got a handful instead of the veritable FLOOD of posts I was expecting when I saw you say it. [PS todd, is there any way to post via email? My first thought was "no, stop, don't do that!" but I have not kept up (...) (26 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: All UK Groups subscribed?
|
| (...) Let's see. I'll do my best to interpret what I think Richard is suggesting: Combine or split Net gain ===...=== ======== Channel Islands & IOM -> CI&IOM -1 London -> North London & South London +1 Reading & Windsor -> Berkshire -1 Exeter & (...) (26 years ago, 14-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: All UK Groups subscribed?
|
| (...) Technically, you did break a rule of the LUGNET Terms of Use. But I think it's obvious to everyone here that you had no malicious intentions; your actions were with decent and innocent intentions. I wrote a script to go through and cancel all (...) (26 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.general)
|
51 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
