| |
On Thu, 13 May 1999 22:03:18 GMT, richard.dee@virgin.net (Richard Dee)
wrote:
> You did somewhere comment on how many posts. There was an attempt to do
> it all at once, but it failed. It was only 10 or so, multiple cross-post.
Ah! That would explain why I only got a handful instead of the
veritable FLOOD of posts I was expecting when I saw you say it.
[PS todd, is there any way to post via email? My first thought was
"no, stop, don't do that!" but I have not kept up my lugnet groups at
ALL well on Agent -- got busy. You know how life goes -- and did not
want to have to deal with it.
Eventually, the thread got long enough I decided to deal with it
anyway. And am posting from AGent. But it would be much easier to post
from email... if that is possible?
Sarah Heacock
Sarah Heacock sarah@eskimo.com
aka Vonfirmath, brown dragon of rider Tembaly, Telgar-5
"Hold yourself responsible for a higher standard than
anybody else expects of you." -- Henry Ward Beecher
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: All UK Groups subscribed?
|
| (...) Yes, of course. :) If you send mail to <lugnet.loc.uk@lugnet.com>, your message will appear in the lugnet.loc.uk group, provided that your emailer is configured with the same name/email settings as your newsreader (or, more precisely, provided (...) (25 years ago, 14-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: All UK Groups subscribed?
|
| On Thu, 13 May 1999 07:39:26 GMT, Todd Lehman uttered the following profundities... (...) Quite true. There was no malicious intent. But knee-jerk reactions, bad results. You did somewhere comment on how many posts. There was an attempt to do it all (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.general)
|
51 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
