Subject:
|
Re: Meta discussion about guidance
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 4 Mar 2002 20:51:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1083 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, David Koudys writes:
> If we bring back the consensus to the newsgroup, would that be better or
> not? Would that help or just restart the discussion?
First of all, I think that no followup would be needed most of the time because
consensus would typically agree with the original guidance provider. I think.
Then, if the followup note had FUT set back to xxx then even if there was
resultant conversation it would likely be where it belonged.
And if it turned out that this kind of consensus followup did actually hurt, we
could revise the process.
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Meta discussion about guidance
|
| (...) The first bit of guidance, 'That reply (or topic) is off-topic for this newsgroup. Perhaps this thread should be taken elsewhere (or to specific group) for further discussion.' I feel we don't need a disclaimer for the first guiding post. In (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
