Subject:
|
RE: Porthole alternative
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 1 Mar 2002 05:23:33 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
<bram@po.NOMORESPAMcwru.edu>
|
Viewed:
|
479 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Kyle Beatty writes:
> Is it possible, just possible, that the norm (a scary-ish
> notion in and of itself) is approximately zero-tolerance?
> And therefore very nearly unsupportable? The mere appearance
> that there are Posting Police (whether there is or isn't) is
> really unfortunate and counter productive. Moderation in
> everything, but especially in moderation.
Hopefully this thread is far enough removed from the original infraction
that this post can be taken as unbiased...
IMHO, all the "policing", or "gentle guidance", or whatever posts are
much more annoying than the infractions themselves. The corrections are
just as off-topic, if not more so, than the original off-topic post. It
seems more and more that every incident gets drawn out into a flame war
because people take each other too seriously or take comments too
personally.
I sometimes wonder why I waste time reading LUGNET...it seems that the
noise to content ratio is just as bad as RTL was when we moved here.
The only difference is that now the noise is people arguing about every
little thing, where as before it was auction announcements and spam.
I'm seriously not sure which I prefer. I'm pretty sure that this is the
reason some great individuals have taken temporary or permanent breaks
from LUGNET.
Just my .02, *please* don't take any statement here personally, it's
meant as a generalization.
--Bram
Bram Lambrecht
bram@cwru.edu
www.bldesign.org
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Porthole alternative
|
| (...) Is it possible, just possible, that the norm (a scary-ish notion in and of itself) is approximately zero-tolerance? And therefore very nearly unsupportable? The mere appearance that there are Posting Police (whether there is or isn't) is (...) (22 years ago, 1-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
39 Messages in This Thread: ![Re: Porthole alternative -Richard Morton (28-Feb-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Porthole alternative -Larry Pieniazek (28-Feb-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Porthole alternative -Richard W. Schamus (28-Feb-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Porthole alternative -David Koudys (28-Feb-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Porthole alternative -Larry Pieniazek (28-Feb-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Porthole alternative -David Koudys (28-Feb-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Porthole alternative -Matt Hein (1-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Porthole alternative -Tim Courtney (1-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Porthole alternative -Kyle Beatty (1-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Porthole alternative -Tim Courtney (1-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Porthole alternative -Kyle Beatty (1-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Porthole alternative -Tim Courtney (1-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Porthole alternative -Scott Arthur (1-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Porthole alternative -Frank Filz (1-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Porthole alternative -David Koudys (1-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Porthole alternative -Scott Arthur (1-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Porthole alternative -Duane Hess (1-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Porthole alternative -David Koudys (1-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Porthole alternative -Larry Pieniazek (2-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![RE: Porthole alternative -Bram Lambrecht (2-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Porthole alternative -Larry Pieniazek (2-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Porthole alternative -Matt Hein (2-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Flaming about guidance given -Larry Pieniazek (3-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Flaming about guidance given -Matt Hein (3-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Flaming about guidance given -David Koudys (4-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Flaming about guidance given -David Koudys (4-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Porthole alternative -Christopher L. Weeks (3-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Meta discussion about guidance -Larry Pieniazek (4-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Meta discussion about guidance -David Koudys (4-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Meta discussion about guidance -Christopher L. Weeks (4-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Meta discussion about guidance -Larry Pieniazek (4-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Meta discussion about guidance -David Koudys (4-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Meta discussion about guidance -Christopher L. Weeks (4-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Meta discussion about guidance -William R. Ward (4-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Porthole alternative -Kyle Beatty (2-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Porthole alternative -Scott Arthur (1-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Porthole alternative -Matt Hein (2-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Porthole alternative -Christopher L. Weeks (3-Mar-02 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|