Subject:
|
Re: Flaming about guidance given
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 3 Mar 2002 16:32:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5224 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> Consider the alternative: guidance given and received without incident, and
> no flamage. Wouldn't that be much more pleasant? The appropriate response to
> guidance is "thanks, I'll keep that in mind", not bucking.
Yeah, I agree on that one. I would rather have a discussion without the
arguements, so I can have peace of mind, cuz right now, this has nothing to
do with portholes.
> I said it before... the fact that "rowdy elements" unreasonably buck against
> guidance isn't going to make me (and others) stop giving it. But it does
> indeed get very tiresome to get dragged into these relatively pointless
> discussions about it over and over when the admins have already said it's
> appropriate (and appreciated) to give gentle guidance.
Pointless, yes. Tiresome? Definitely. I've had my say on this discussion, so
I'm gonna call it quits, see ya.
<<_Matt Hein_>>
Lugnet member No. 1112
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Flaming about guidance given
|
| (...) and an off topic follow up, one out of many that were ON topic... (...) I agree. If you're actually concerned about flame wars though, ask yourself who is doing the flaming and who is merely defending their actions in support of what the bulk (...) (25 years ago, 3-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
