Subject:
|
Re: Porthole alternative
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 16:39:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
354 times
|
| |
|
|
Come on Lar,
I think we can all see the difference between posting a message saying XX
parts now in my brinklink store, and a link to an image that shows a
valuable building technique which also states in the image (and not in the
original posting) that the parts are available at his bricklink store.
It's just like making a posting about something, which as part of my
signature block has a link to my Lego website, which in turn has a link to
my bricklink store.
I appreciate that no-one wants the type of messages that appear in
.brickshops or .auctions flooding .trains, but I think Brams posting had
valuable tips for all of us interested in a better model 10020.
Just my 2c worth.
--
Richard
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message
news:Gs6y6C.F8L@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.trains, Bram Lambrecht writes:
> > Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > In my view your follow up post to the original advertisment
> > > you snuck in to .trains should have went to
> > > lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade only. I suspect that view is
> > > held by others as well.
> >
> > I knew you were gonna yell at me...
>
> I see no yelling. Merely gentle guidance.
>
> > but I figured the original post was
>
> (off topic)
>
> > in trains, can't hurt to port one extra message there
>
> (because I got away with the first one?)
>
> > to keep everything
> > in the same place. Instead we now have three off-topic messages...
>
> Four.
>
> FUT admin.general since you seem to have an issue with gentle guidance on
> this. Your original message was off topic for .trains and a followup post
> saying merely "I sold out" was even more clearly off topic.
>
> Unless you think you get a special pass on this for some reason. Take it • up
> with the admins since my guidance has failed.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Porthole alternative
|
| (...) Which is why the original post, which had on topic aspects, got merely a ribbing. I whould have hoped that Bram was enough of a thought leader to connect the dots (where his purely market relatd followup should go) without an explicit warning. (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
