Subject:
|
Re: A new scan for 371 (some proof?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 25 May 2000 16:57:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3150 times
|
| |
|
|
Jason Proksch wrote:
> In lugnet.general, Gary R. Istok writes:
> >
> >
> > Jason Proksch wrote:
> >
> > <major snippage>
> >
> > > I am now leaning more toward the first 2 options. Perhaps the poor quality
> > > reflects Samsonites inability to match lego's quality. Come to think of it, my
> > > #717? Samsonite has some errors (or inconsistencies) in its instructions as
> > > well.
> >
> >
> > Did someone say "Junior Constructor"? Set 717..... from 1961-64. Is that the one
> > you are talking about Jason (by the way, glad you decided to "de-lurk"). If so, are
> > you talking about the earlier gabled house (1961-62) or the later flat roofed house
> > (1963-64) version of the Junior Constructor? I always thought the building
> > instructions were only on the inside lid of the box. Do you have other instructions
> > to this set? (Note: I first got the later version of thiis set as a kid in 1963, my
> > mother threw away the box, and I obtained another complete set on EBAY in 1998.)
> > Also, the (Samsonite only) Junior Constructor was the first model kit LEGO ever sold
> > (it was not part of the Town Plan).
> >
> > Gary Istok
>
> My set is the flat roofed one. I know very little about it but got it on ebay
> last year pretty cheap $20-30. I only have the instructions on the box (I would
> assume that is the only instructions included) Do you mean to say this is the
> very first model kit of legos? Or do you mean the first in the US?
> What do you think it is worth?
> I built the house, but it is pretty difficult from the 4 or 5 pictures provided
> (along with a few mistakes).
>
> Jason Proksch
> PS I have to get back to all the 371 messages I missed over the last few days...
Jason,
OK, yes the 4 pictures on the inside lid of the box are the only building instructions
that were included in this set. I first got it as a kid, and within 6 months my mother
threw away the box (I still have the original contents mixed in with other old LEGO).
Recently I got a 2nd copy of this set (I paid $63), but the set might only have been
played with once. The pieces were absolutely mint.
LEGO started with the Town Plan theme in the mid 1950's. Up until 1961, all LEGO sets
were either part of the Town Plan, a basic building set (only white and red bricks with
red windows), or a parts pack. In 1961 Samsonite was licensed to produce/sell LEGO in
the USA (starting in 1962 in Canada with the same sets). Their 2nd largest set (after
725 Town Plan) was the Junior Constructor #717. Both these large sets came in 2 versions
- the earlier 1961-62 version, and the 1963-64 version. What you and I both have is the
1963-64 version. The earlier 1961-62 version (gable roofed house), was the first model
kit not associated with the Town Plan. This was followed in 1963 with the Architectural
Sets (#750, #751, #752) consisting mostly of plates and clear bricks, and in 1965 came
the Train Sets. Other subsystems came later in the 70's.
The early LEGO sets from the 50's and 60's did not have the detailed instructions that
they have today. You had to use your own imagination to figure out how the back of
buildings are supposed to look. It was just a different philosophy back then. LEGO
expected you to use your own creativity to solve the puzzle of how to finish a building
when the instructions were not detailed enough. That was not, however, an example of
poor instructions like with the 371 set. Back when I was a kid TLC did not "spoon feed"
us instructions as to how to build LEGO buildings. You had to figure it out yourself.
That was actually part of the fun for building for me. Today TLC gives you instructions
for every piece in a set.
As to how much they are worth is one of those subjective questions. You paid $30 for
yours, I paid $63 for mine (includes shipping). I would have paid over $100 if I had to,
to get an example. If I found the earlier version in good condition, I probably would
have paid as much as $200. About 6 months ago I found a 1966 set on EBAY that I really
wanted (for the specialty parts), and I ended up getting it for only $18. A month ago I
found a 2nd copy, and I had to pay $115 to get it. It all depends on how many people
really want something at the same time.
Gary Istok
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: A new scan for 371 (some proof?)
|
| (...) My set is the flat roofed one. I know very little about it but got it on ebay last year pretty cheap $20-30. I only have the instructions on the box (I would assume that is the only instructions included) Do you mean to say this is the very (...) (24 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.general)
|
40 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
