To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / 9656
9655  |  9657
Subject: 
Re: next year
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.starwars
Date: 
Thu, 2 Nov 2000 16:43:32 GMT
Viewed: 
2578 times
  
In lugnet.starwars, Eric Joslin writes:

Ah, I see what you mean. :D


I can't remember which book it was in, but when I got to the one with the Sun
Crusher, I pretty much stopped.  In the middle of the book.  That was the last
one I read.

Yeah, the Sun Crusher was kind of cheesy... an ultimate weapon more powerful
than the Death Star?  Wasn't the Death Star the "ultimate weapon?"  The
ability to destroy a star, what's next?  Whole galaxies?



I read the Hier to the Empire trilogy, and I enjoyed it immensely.  I never
read the Jedi Academy books.


The Jedi Academy books were pretty good, but not nearly as good as the Heir
to the Empire books.


Yeah.  I've run the Star Wars Role-playing Game at various points, and I've
never used one of the main characters, or even anything near them.  The Star
Wars universe is *huge*, and so full of cool stuff, I've never understood why
writers feel like they have to make their book focus on Luke, Leia, Han, etc.
Why not write about other folks in the rebellion?  Why not write about
smugglers trying to avoid the Imperial troops?  Gah.


There's the "Tales From..." books, I never really got into those though.
It's kind of cool to read what happened to obscure characters (like the
Rancor Keeper) after their appearance in the films, but the books just
couldn't hold my attention.  There's also the X-Wing series of books and
others like that.  The Star Wars Universe isn't just about the characters...
it's about the "religions," the vehicles, the technology, the locales, etc.
It's such a broad spectrum of topics that, like you, I can't understand why
writers focus on the main characters from the films.


The last thing I heard is that Lucas himself won't make a third trilogy, but
would "leave it to someone else".  I imagine that someone else would end up
being Rick McCallum, who has essentially been alongside Lucas for most of the
Star Wars movies...  so I would trust him to do good things.  Especially
because I don't think Lucas would ever really not be hanging around giving the
nod to stuff, at the very least.

eric

Heh, maybe they'll keep Lucas' head alive after he dies so he can oversee
the continuation of the Star Wars saga... like they did with Walt Disney... ;)

-Bryan



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: next year
 
(...) That was my beef. The Death Star was bad enough, get over it. Come up with something more interesting that has to be defeated. There are other interesting conflicts besides Big Bad Technological Things. (...) That's why I never read them, (...) (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.starwars)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: next year
 
(...) Ah, I see what you mean. :D (...) I can't remember which book it was in, but when I got to the one with the Sun Crusher, I pretty much stopped. In the middle of the book. That was the last one I read. (...) I read the Hier to the Empire (...) (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.starwars)

55 Messages in This Thread:
















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR