Subject:
|
Re: next year
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.adventurers
|
Date:
|
Tue, 31 Oct 2000 07:00:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3286 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.adventurers, Andrew Summersgill writes:
> > and Star Wars, all set in the present or future.
>
> Sorry - got to be picky here, Star Wars is probably the oldest era of all
> Lego sets - it was after all set "Long long ago in a galaxy far far away".
No, it was set in our future, but the story was being told by someone for
whom the events of the Star Wars saga were in the past. Got it?
> Apologies - going away now.
>
> Andrew.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: next year
|
| (...) No, I don't think that you can draw that conclusion. There's nothing in the movie to date it (by our timeline) and while it seems to be a retelling of a story (at least from the intro scrolls with each movie) it's not a given. I know the (...) (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.starwars)
| | | Re: next year
|
| Lucas & co. did make it clear once back in the eighties that Star Wars is set in the distant past (even from our present standpoint). -- Paul Davidson, aka Tinman www.theforce.net | Your Daily Dose of Star Wars www.filmforce.net | Your Daily Dose of (...) (24 years ago, 10-Nov-00, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: next year
|
| (...) Sorry - got to be picky here, Star Wars is probably the oldest era of all Lego sets - it was after all set "Long long ago in a galaxy far far away". Apologies - going away now. Andrew. (24 years ago, 30-Oct-00, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
55 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
