Subject:
|
Re: next year
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Sat, 4 Nov 2000 06:30:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2607 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Mike Petrucelli writes:
> In lugnet.starwars, Adrick Tolliver writes:
> > > Lucasfilm's offical policy on canon is: (in order of overruling for
> > > contradictions) Movies, Raido Dramas, Novelisations of the Movies, Expansion
> > > novels published by Bantam Books, Comics published by Dark Horse. All of • these
> > > ARE CANON.
> >
> > What about the new (and old) Del Rey books? Kids books?
>
> Well unless the policy was changed in the past few months any expansion novel
> NOT published by Bantam Books is NOT Canon. If Del Rey bought Bantam or vice
> versa then maybe this has changed.
It has. My take on canon is that evrey thing that is not DRICTICILY
contradicted by a movie or new novel is canon to me (i.e. Ewok movies, kids
books(exceped for the Galaxy of Fear and the godawful Hand of Vader seires)
comic books (Old and new) ect.
Adrick
> >
> >
> > > Everything else (droids cartoon, ewoks cartoon, star wars christmas
> > > special, splinter of the mind's eye,
> >
> > Why not splinter of the mind's eye?
>
> Same reason as above and of course Empire Strikes Back overrules it.
>
> -Lord Insanity
> >
> > > ect.) ARE NOT canon.
> >
> > Adrick
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: next year
|
| (...) these (...) Well unless the policy was changed in the past few months any expansion novel NOT published by Bantam Books is NOT Canon. If Del Rey bought Bantam or vice versa then maybe this has changed. (...) Same reason as above and of course (...) (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
55 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
