| |
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 02:12:58PM +0000, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> With that in mind, I think it's time to start the trash talk. I didn't
> get to talk anti-x times, or anything like that. But I have a
> suggestion for "anti-x" times in Connect-4.
Booooring.
So far, without actually writing any of the code, it seems that our
robot's logic code would be something around 10 lines of NQC script.
And still be able to beat other robots :)
How's that for trash?
--
Dan Boger
dan@peeron.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: C$
|
| (...) TOO SLOW!!!! DAN-OH. I've already posted C$ code that beats out anything posted so far!!! if i was not uesing a SLOW 8088 laptop, and a web interface to post I'd search for the link Chris (21 years ago, 7-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: C$
|
| (...) Isn't this question already answered in the posted "rules" (yes, it is) (...) I was able to build a device that could easily handle the interlocking chips. And, for the record, the chips I was using seem to be very "LEGO-friendly" sizes. With (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
35 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
