| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Trevyn Watson wrote:
> > Does anyone know whether a new set would have the interlocking pieces?
>
> This week, I got a set at TRU. It DOES have interlocking pieces.
>
> Last week, a friend got a set at Wal*mart. It DOES NOT have interlocking
> pieces.
I can conform this. I bought a C4 set at Walmart and it does not have
interlocking pieces. The box is identical to Michael's (from TRU) and it even
shows interlocking pieces on the front. The legs and board itself are the same I
would assume.
My suggestion? If you haven't bought one already, get it at Walmart. Its cheaper
and the pieces are non-interlocking. Now this raises some questions: do we just
use our own pieces during the game? Could the non-interlocking factor be viewed
as an advantage? I wouldn't mind building a hopper that can process interlocking
pieces, but I don't have any...
Rob
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: C$
|
| (...) Sure, it could be an advantage, but I'm going to outline all the stupid whining already: a) "But we already bought the interlocking ones!" b) "But we already own an interlocking one from my sister's son's best friend's toy collection!" We're (...) (21 years ago, 5-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: C$
|
| (...) This week, I got a set at TRU. It DOES have interlocking pieces. Last week, a friend got a set at Wal*mart. It DOES NOT have interlocking pieces. I don't know any more about the difference. Steve (21 years ago, 2-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
35 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
